PartyPoker = best?

[Jojje_2k]

Many says that partypoker has the best games because the players are so bad, is that true?

Or are there any other site that has worse players.

Ongame, full tilt , ultimate bet,??

[Backspin20]

no Americans @ party....so what do you think?

[Jojje_2k]

[ QUOTE ]
no Americans @ party....so what do you think?

[/ QUOTE ]

Don't know if you mean americans are good or bad [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[Jojje_2k]

I assume that you think americans are bad players so the players on partypoker are not to bad now?

[Jojje_2k]

Are there worse players at Full Tilt?

[dersl]

only true for the higher stakes

[Kurn, son of Mogh]

[ QUOTE ]
I assume that you think americans are bad players so the players on partypoker are not to bad now?

[/ QUOTE ]

Not at all. No Americans means far fewer players. Far fewer players = far fewer bad players.

The bigger the pool the more likely bad players will play, and the US is the most populous country in the world with extensive internet access. Now maybe in 5 or 10 years India and China will have a high percentage of people with fast internet connections, but until that happens, the US will be the biggest fish tank in the world.

[cardman]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
no Americans @ party....so what do you think?

[/ QUOTE ]

Don't know if you mean americans are good or bad [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Neither. Just that the good American players are more likely to go through the hassles required to gamble online while the American fishies are more likely less hardcore and play offline. The UIGEA effect.

Edit added: Looks like DMoogle posted faster than me to answer the question.

[Stake Monster]

I stopped playing on Party when my "unmentionable" got pulled.