|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
2 very basic Stud 8 3rd st ?\'s--
I ve been watching training videos and I saw soemone limp in a somewhat loose game ,2nd position with xQQ ( q showing) with an ace behind him. Is that standard for everyone?
Also 3 suited cards with 2 lo cards, 10-5-3 suited all pretty live ive seen play also in early position. Id muck in both spots but maybe im playing 2 tight. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2 very basic Stud 8 3rd st ?\'s--
1. dump
2. I play every time. Even something crappy like J83s I play. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2 very basic Stud 8 3rd st ?\'s--
1. Throw it in the muck.
2. It depends on how much raising there is; if you can see 4th for just the bringin it is correct to play that but if there is a lot of raising (or you see two aces behind you) then save your money and throw it away. If there were zero cards of your suit dead I'd play it even in a more aggressive game. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2 very basic Stud 8 3rd st ?\'s--
Your correct to muck them in both spots. The flush draw is playable in late position when you know you will likely only have to pay one bet to see 4th street.
TT [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2 very basic Stud 8 3rd st ?\'s--
both are mucks in a tough game.
both are playable in a passive game. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2 very basic Stud 8 3rd st ?\'s--
[ QUOTE ]
both are mucks in a tough game. both are playable in a passive game. [/ QUOTE ] Agree with this. Also since I'm 90% sure Joe Tall played these in a deucescracked video, I thought the first one was in a shorthanded situation but can't remember for sure. The second one was super live in a proven loose passive game so clearly I think the first one is more debateable. -DeathDonkey |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2 very basic Stud 8 3rd st ?\'s--
i dont play either of these unless its HU.. maybe 3 handed if the others are passive.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2 very basic Stud 8 3rd st ?\'s--
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] both are mucks in a tough game. both are playable in a passive game. [/ QUOTE ] Agree with this. Also since I'm 90% sure Joe Tall played these in a deucescracked video, I thought the first one was in a shorthanded situation but can't remember for sure. The second one was super live in a proven loose passive game so clearly I think the first one is more debateable. -DeathDonkey [/ QUOTE ] the first one xqq was joetall, the second was from pokerfox.net both games were passive but not short. I dont like qq with 2-3 lows to the flop tho, right? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2 very basic Stud 8 3rd st ?\'s--
Why don't we want 2 lows fighting it out? Of course we'd rather scoop, but we get half the loser's action.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2 very basic Stud 8 3rd st ?\'s--
[ QUOTE ]
Your correct to muck them in both spots. The flush draw is playable in late position when you know you will likely only have to pay one bet to see 4th street. TT [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Now that I know who played the hands, I'm 99% sure it was absolutely fine. Both hands are playable by an expert because he is adjusting to the game conditions. Sure both hands have inherent risks, but in the hands of a player who reads hands well and understand table textures you can open up your range. TT [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] |
|
|