Forum: Poker Legislation
10-04-2006, 08:10 PM
|
|
Replies: 6
Views: 54
Re: Positive Article Hopefully True
IntRAstate means in the same state.
It would be inTERstate if it was between sites.
That's why public websites are on the Internet, but ones for people to use on corporate LANS are on intranets.
|
|
Forum: Home Poker
10-04-2006, 08:06 PM
|
|
Replies: 13
Views: 79
Re: Passive Angleshoot?
This is what I would have done:
Called the 20. When the other player bitched I would have said this:
"Yes, I know it's not a legal raise. But we've let the rule go by in the past and I didn't...
|
|
Forum: Home Poker
10-04-2006, 08:01 PM
|
|
Replies: 34
Views: 144
|
|
Forum: Home Poker
10-04-2006, 07:59 PM
|
|
Replies: 34
Views: 144
|
|
Forum: Home Poker
10-03-2006, 11:45 PM
|
|
Replies: 6
Views: 60
Re: Yet another dumb question on raises
Thank you for your concise explanation. And sorry for the typos and mis-wording.
Looking back on it, I had it more complicated than I thought it was. It really is as simple as: minumum raise =...
|
|
Forum: Home Poker
10-03-2006, 06:33 PM
|
|
Replies: 34
Views: 144
|
|
Forum: Home Poker
10-03-2006, 01:29 PM
|
|
Replies: 34
Views: 144
|
|
Forum: Home Poker
10-03-2006, 12:12 PM
|
|
Replies: 6
Views: 60
|
|
Forum: Home Poker
10-03-2006, 10:15 AM
|
|
Replies: 6
Views: 60
Re: Yet another dumb question on raises
Well, I guess what I was looking for was probably a simpler question:
I know post-flop the minumum bet is twice the raise that was before me (if someone raises 200, I must raise 400)
Pre-flop,...
|
|
Forum: Home Poker
10-03-2006, 09:49 AM
|
|
Replies: 6
Views: 60
Yet another dumb question on raises
I'm trying to make sure I've got the math right.
Blinds 100/200.
SB posts 100
BB posts 200
UTG min raises to 400
Player B's min raise is 400 (to call UTG) + 200 (min raisex2 BB) for 600...
|
|
Forum: Poker Legislation
10-02-2006, 09:34 PM
|
|
Replies: 21
Views: 317
|
|
Forum: Poker Legislation
10-02-2006, 09:30 PM
|
|
Replies: 14
Views: 82
|
|
Forum: Poker Legislation
10-02-2006, 05:06 PM
|
|
Replies: 52
Views: 209
Re: Nollan Dalla\'s comments, worth reading
[ QUOTE ]
If print magazines were to lose all the online poker room advertising, the magazine industry would very likely go back to something close to a pre-2003 status. Back then, Card Player and...
|
|
Forum: Poker Legislation
10-02-2006, 04:52 PM
|
|
Replies: 52
Views: 209
Re: Nollan Dalla\'s comments, worth reading
[ QUOTE ]
There are too many crappy magazines as it is.
[/ QUOTE ]
Well, apparently our goverment decided there are too many crappy poker players around. /images/graemlins/smile.gif
...
|
|
Forum: Poker Legislation
10-02-2006, 04:41 PM
|
|
Replies: 52
Views: 209
Re: Nollan Dalla\'s comments, worth reading
[/ QUOTE ]
And this counters my thinking how?
I'm sure the magazines will see their ad revenue suffer but the fact that the magazine is full of online poker ads doesn't mean the online poker...
|
|
Forum: Poker Legislation
10-02-2006, 04:33 PM
|
|
Replies: 52
Views: 209
|
|
Forum: Poker Legislation
10-02-2006, 04:10 PM
|
|
Replies: 52
Views: 209
Re: Nollan Dalla\'s comments, worth reading
[/ QUOTE ]
That can't happen until the regulations are out which is months away at the earliest. And quite frankly, it's looking now like the whole hubbub is much ado about nothing.
[/ QUOTE...
|
|
Forum: Poker Legislation
10-02-2006, 03:58 PM
|
|
Replies: 52
Views: 209
Re: Nollan Dalla\'s comments, worth reading
[ QUOTE ]
However, I think he is probably wrong when he says that advertising will end. There's nothing in this new law that eliminates the ".net" loophole, as far as I know.
-N
[/ QUOTE ]
...
|
