Forum: Internet Gambling
09-07-2007, 08:54 PM
|
Replies: 64
Views: 286
|
Forum: Internet Gambling
09-07-2007, 06:31 PM
|
Replies: 64
Views: 286
Re: PokerStars say you can break their rules
[ QUOTE ]
poker rules are arbitrary and are always subject to interpretation and the discrpency of the adjudicator.
[/ QUOTE ]
That's not strictly true. The rules regarding which hands win are...
|
Forum: Internet Gambling
09-06-2007, 05:42 PM
|
Replies: 64
Views: 286
Re: PokerStars say you can break their rules
OP's point is that the response to such an violation should be explicit, and not arbitrary. This policy seems arbitrary to me; either you are permitted to announce your putative hand holding are you...
|
Forum: STT Strategy
09-04-2007, 12:01 PM
|
Replies: 3
Views: 147
|
Forum: STT Strategy
09-04-2007, 11:52 AM
|
Replies: 38
Views: 130
Re: sharkscope
Which raises a privacy issue, but I guess you have to agree to its terms before playing, and in general I think this is their only option in terms of effective security measures... still curious as...
|
Forum: Internet Gambling
09-04-2007, 11:44 AM
|
Replies: 44
Views: 237
|
Forum: STT Strategy
09-04-2007, 10:30 AM
|
Replies: 7
Views: 48
|
Forum: STT Strategy
09-04-2007, 09:50 AM
|
Replies: 11
Views: 71
|
Forum: STT Strategy
09-04-2007, 09:40 AM
|
Replies: 8
Views: 266
|
Forum: STT Strategy
09-04-2007, 09:35 AM
|
Replies: 38
Views: 130
Re: sharkscope
Didn't know about this. I don't think there is any way for Stars to tell whether you have Sharkscope open in your browser, but then I could be mistaken. Any hardcore cheaters can easily run their...
|
Forum: STT Strategy
09-04-2007, 09:24 AM
|
Replies: 7
Views: 43
Re: QQ, 4 bet or call? $55+5 stars full table
If you're button I like pushing; too many donks see a 3-bet from the button as a steal attempt. With no read and this betting pattern I think he's a donk and his range is probably 88+, AJ+ (sometimes...
|
Forum: STT Strategy
08-31-2007, 07:19 PM
|
Replies: 15
Views: 197
|
Forum: STT Strategy
08-30-2007, 08:15 PM
|
Replies: 6
Views: 180
|
Forum: STT Strategy
08-30-2007, 07:32 PM
|
Replies: 15
Views: 197
|
Forum: STT Strategy
08-30-2007, 06:02 PM
|
Replies: 5
Views: 35
|
Forum: STT Strategy
08-30-2007, 05:59 PM
|
Replies: 5
Views: 86
|
Forum: STT Strategy
08-30-2007, 05:44 PM
|
Replies: 3
Views: 39
|
Forum: STT Strategy
08-28-2007, 08:12 PM
|
Replies: 26
Views: 129
|
Forum: STT Strategy
08-28-2007, 11:21 AM
|
Replies: 17
Views: 68
Re: 27s, AK as a CL, is it a bad call?
I agree that's a better range. Even with QQ, KK, AA removed (and AQ included) this is marginally -EV.
Okay so the lesson is fold AK in this spot, unless villain is a complete maniac.
|
Forum: STT Strategy
08-28-2007, 10:49 AM
|
Replies: 17
Views: 68
Re: 27s, AK as a CL, is it a bad call?
Chances are pretty low OP will have a pushing hand, so I can't see this as a great reason to push a hand you'd rather have action on with only 3 opponents left. The two big hands, AA & KK, he...
|
Forum: STT Strategy
08-28-2007, 10:01 AM
|
Replies: 7
Views: 98
|
Forum: STT Strategy
08-28-2007, 09:32 AM
|
Replies: 10
Views: 81
Re: $60 L1 AK flops nut flush draw
Yeah any effective bet you can make will commit you anyways, so just open-push. The check-push is less appealing, since the same commitment argument applies to any of your opponents, you don't have a...
|
Forum: STT Strategy
08-28-2007, 09:25 AM
|
Replies: 5
Views: 36
Re: $60 L1 QQ overpair, turn is K
Very tough to isolate his range with no read. He's played and won a hand already, apparently. Could this mean he's loose? Too little information...
He could have: AJ+, with at least one spade (but...
|
Forum: STT Strategy
08-28-2007, 09:10 AM
|
Replies: 8
Views: 47
|
Forum: STT Strategy
08-28-2007, 08:04 AM
|
Replies: 12
Views: 71
|