Re: Quiz#20 Same Concept
 

[ QUOTE ]
And after this river comes and the opponent checks again, I think we bluff about 40%.


[/ QUOTE ]

This is true if he adapts to how we play, if he doesnt we only need to know what he will call with on this river and bet if its a winning play.

Also, we cant randomly bluff because if we - for example - bluff first time and he calls with pair of 2s and win pot it would be idiotic to bluff a 2nd time because he will now call with all hands that beats us, including a better Q (well [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] )

Normally we want a player who does a misstake to do this more often, so normally we want a LP to call more and bet less. We will then win a few less pots since he calls a lot on river but win bigger pots every time we are ahead. If this is true, betting this river as a bluff hoping he will call us with any2 in future when he sees what we bet with on river would be a good investment in future hands.

Re: Quiz#20 Same Concept
 

This came up in the micro-limit forum as well,
and Stox responded.