Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-10-2006, 03:05 PM
tech tech is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sports betting
Posts: 2,041
Default Baseball HOF Results

Sutter in. Everybody else out. Honestly I doubt any of the others will ever get in.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-10-2006, 03:17 PM
TheRover TheRover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,910
Default Re: Baseball HOF Results

web page

Candidate Votes % of Votes
Bruce Sutter 400 76.9
Jim Rice 337 64.8
Rich Gossage 336 64.6
Andre Dawson 317 61.0
Bert Blyleven 277 53.3
Lee Smith 234 45.0
Jack Morris 214 41.2
Tommy John 154 29.6
Steve Garvey 135 26.0
Alan Trammell 92 17.7
Dave Parker 76 14.4
Dave Concepcion 65 12.5
Don Mattingly 64 12.3
Orel Hershiser 58 11.2
Dale Murphy 56 10.8
Albert Belle 40 7.7
Will Clark 23 4.4
Dwight Gooden 17 3.3
Willie McGee 12 2.3
Hal Morris 5 1.0
Ozzie Guillen 5 1.0
Gary Gaetti 4 0.8
John Wetteland 4 0.8
Rick Aguilera 3 0.6
Doug Jones 2 0.4
Greg Jefferies 2 0.4
Walt Weiss 1 0.2
Gary DiSarcina 0 0.0
Alex Fernandez 0 0.0

ozzie gullien lol.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-10-2006, 03:23 PM
Kevin Kevin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Pittsburgh Pa (North Suburb called Cranberry Township)
Posts: 356
Default Re: Baseball HOF Results

[ QUOTE ]
Sutter in. Everybody else out. Honestly I doubt any of the others will ever get in.

[/ QUOTE ]

I can't stand the idea of relievers (read failed starters) getting into the HOF. Look at Gagne's stats as a starter befroe he went to the pen, or better still, look at the collection of 40 save Reds (Williamson, Graves) who were mediocre at best when starting the game versus finishing it.

Really cheapens the honor for teh guys like Aaron, Mays, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-10-2006, 03:27 PM
samjjones samjjones is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 9,415
Default Re: Baseball HOF Results

Sutter and Gossage were the first two guys on the cusp of the "Closer Era". Like it or not, the advent of the closer changed the way the game was played. So when you combine his stats and impact on the game, I think Sutter isn't a horrible inclusion.

For that same reason, I think Tommy John/Dr. James Andrews should be inducted.

Next year should be interesting with Gwynn/Ripken/MCGWIRE on the ballot. McGwire furor should be entertaining.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-10-2006, 03:28 PM
DVaut1 DVaut1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 4,751
Default Re: Baseball HOF Results

[ QUOTE ]
web page

Candidate Votes % of Votes
Bruce Sutter 400 76.9
Jim Rice 337 64.8
Rich Gossage 336 64.6
Andre Dawson 317 61.0
Bert Blyleven 277 53.3
Lee Smith 234 45.0
Jack Morris 214 41.2
Tommy John 154 29.6
Steve Garvey 135 26.0
Alan Trammell 92 17.7
Dave Parker 76 14.4
Dave Concepcion 65 12.5
Don Mattingly 64 12.3
Orel Hershiser 58 11.2
Dale Murphy 56 10.8
Albert Belle 40 7.7
Will Clark 23 4.4
Dwight Gooden 17 3.3
Willie McGee 12 2.3
Hal Morris 5 1.0
Ozzie Guillen 5 1.0
Gary Gaetti 4 0.8
John Wetteland 4 0.8
Rick Aguilera 3 0.6
Doug Jones 2 0.4
Greg Jefferies 2 0.4
Walt Weiss 1 0.2
Gary DiSarcina 0 0.0
Alex Fernandez 0 0.0

ozzie gullien lol.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't know what's worse, Walt Weiss getting 1 vote or Gary DiSarcina being on the ballot at all. DiSarcina had 28 career HRs and a career .258 BA, made one All-Star team, batted over .300 once and over .260 twice.

Why was he even on the ballot?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-10-2006, 03:28 PM
TMTTR TMTTR is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 123 days \'til Pitchers and Catchers
Posts: 2,307
Default Re: Baseball HOF Results

[ QUOTE ]

I can't stand the idea of relievers (read failed starters) getting into the HOF.

[/ QUOTE ]

Funny to say that when Sutter gets in. He can't be called a failed starter since he never started a game in the majors... the first true relief pitcher elected.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-10-2006, 03:36 PM
KilgoreTrout KilgoreTrout is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: This is my boomstick
Posts: 3,126
Default Re: Baseball HOF Results

[ QUOTE ]
Like it or not, the advent of the closer changed the way the game was played

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree with this in Sutter's case. Really dominant closers merit inclusion. That said, I can think of only one current closer who should be in the Hall, and he's starting to level off now.

Not sure how I feel about a closer's team results being brought to bear though. Would Rivera be worthy if he pitched for the Reds?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-10-2006, 03:37 PM
Caldarooni Caldarooni is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,568
Default Re: Baseball HOF Results

I don't know much about it, but Hershiser is/was never expected to make it?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-10-2006, 03:42 PM
LionelHutz00 LionelHutz00 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,662
Default Re: Baseball HOF Results

[ QUOTE ]

I can't stand the idea of relievers (read failed starters) getting into the HOF. Look at Gagne's stats as a starter befroe he went to the pen, or better still, look at the collection of 40 save Reds (Williamson, Graves) who were mediocre at best when starting the game versus finishing it.

Really cheapens the honor for teh guys like Aaron, Mays, etc.

[/ QUOTE ]

Starting pitcher and relief pitcher are like two different positions.

What if Roger Clemens started off as a shortstop but it didn't work out, so he became a starting pitcher? He still would deserve the Hall because he's a successful starting pitcher. He wouldn't be disqualified because he wasn't a great shortstop.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-10-2006, 03:43 PM
TheNoodleMan TheNoodleMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Not using the back button
Posts: 6,873
Default Re: Baseball HOF Results

[ QUOTE ]

For that same reason, I think Tommy John/Dr. James Andrews should be inducted.


[/ QUOTE ]
I think you mean Dr. Frank Jobe.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.