|
|
#1
03-24-2006, 07:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Hee Seop Choi to the Red Sox, for NOTHING.
Hee Seop Choi has been claimed off waivers from the Dodgers by the Boston Red Sox, reports ESPN.com.
You can find it on RotoWire, too. Yeah okay, Ned Colletti. The Dodgers are such a piece of [censored] organization. How the [censored] did the Red Sox waiver claim process, when there are about 8 teams that could use a disciplined and powerful hitter like Choi, say, I dunno, like the Cleveland Indians? [censored] ridiculous. 
|
|
#2
03-24-2006, 07:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hee Seop Choi to the Red Sox, for NOTHING.
Choi hasn't been the same since he had that concussion while playing for the small bears
|
|
#3
03-24-2006, 07:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hee Seop Choi to the Red Sox, for NOTHING.
If the Indians wanted him they would have put a claim in. Not sure why you think they wouldn't put in a claim yet they would trade something for him.
|
|
#5
03-24-2006, 07:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hee Seop Choi to the Red Sox, for NOTHING.
Have you SEEN who they run out there at first base?
|
|
#6
03-24-2006, 07:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hee Seop Choi to the Red Sox, for NOTHING.
[ QUOTE ]
Have you SEEN who they run out there at first base? [/ QUOTE ] If you are talking about the Indians then they would have had waiver priority over the Red Sox. If they wanted him they could have had him. What you are saying doesn't make sense.
|
|
#7
03-24-2006, 07:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hee Seop Choi to the Red Sox, for NOTHING.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Have you SEEN who they run out there at first base? [/ QUOTE ] If you are talking about the Indians then they would have had waiver priority over the Red Sox. If they wanted him they could have had him. What you are saying doesn't make sense. [/ QUOTE ] What I am saying is this: Have you SEEN who the Indians run out there at first base? How that doesn't make any sense is beyond me, but alright.
|
|
#8
03-24-2006, 07:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hee Seop Choi to the Red Sox, for NOTHING.
You are saying the Dodgers suck because they didn't try and him to the Indians, yet the Indians could have gotten him for free and didn't. Why would they pay for something they could have gotten for free?
|
|
#10
03-24-2006, 07:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hee Seop Choi to the Red Sox, for NOTHING.
[ QUOTE ]
You are saying the Dodgers suck because they didn't try and him to the Indians.. [/ QUOTE ] What are you, an idiot? Are you [censored] drunk? I am saying the Dodgers are retarded for releasing him no-strings attached. Period. [ QUOTE ] ...yet the Indians could have gotten him for free and didn't. [/ QUOTE ] And the Indians not making a claim makes no sense to me. Jesus Christ, you really are dumb.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
