Dare I say it

bigballz · #1 05-10-2007, 08:08 PM

I think the strat forum needs to be split

berate me

timex · #2 05-10-2007, 08:18 PM

I think it needs to be removed

Exitonly · #3 05-10-2007, 08:18 PM

i support this, atleast for a trial period.

Bond18 · #4 05-10-2007, 08:28 PM

Yea i've been thinking about this to. I support your motion.

Perhaps under 50 buy in and over?

Ansky · #5 05-10-2007, 08:36 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Yea i've been thinking about this to. I support your motion.

Perhaps under 50 buy in and over?

[/ QUOTE ]

50r+ 200fo+ IMO

Also, >500 for live.

Bond18 · #6 05-10-2007, 08:49 PM

What about the new stars 109 FO's with 3k start? What about stuper/fuper? Also UB's deep stacked FO's and bounty.

I think theres prolly not enough 200 FO's to not include the 100's/150's.

Clayton · #7 05-10-2007, 08:55 PM

what about RPS tournaments

misclick odds · #8 05-10-2007, 08:55 PM

all thatll do is keep the good advice out of the lower buyin forums

bigballz · #9 05-10-2007, 08:56 PM

I was thinking $100 FO+, $55 for rebuys. obv it wouldn't be an even split quantity-wise, but the number of low limit posts is redic compared to the number of higher stakes posts. This sort of reminds me of the debate to split the STTf last year, except I think this is more needed. You have to weed through so much to find the higher stakes threads, more people will feel better posting hands, yada yada...

bigballz · #10 05-10-2007, 08:57 PM

[ QUOTE ]
all thatll do is keep the good advice out of the lower buyin forums

[/ QUOTE ]
think about what you just said, my god

View Poll Results: When considering hands for low purposes only (and with no qualifier on low) which is the better low
Player A with AA234	30	57.69%
Player B with KK234	22	42.31%
Voters: 52. You may not vote on this poll