Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > STT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-07-2007, 12:07 AM
Jshuttlesworth Jshuttlesworth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,688
Default 27s: disagree with SNGPT?

SNGPT has this as an obvious fold for any reasonable ranges (it's in the -1% range), but I think this push is reasonable because we will be forced to call a lot of marginal hand from the BB next time. Thoughts?

PokerStars Tournament, Big Blind is t400 with t25 antes (5 handed) Converter on pregopoker.com

Hero (t1575)
CO (t1895)
Button (t3515)
SB (t3840)
BB (t2675)

Preflop: Hero is in UTG with 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]
<font color="red">Hero raises to t1550 (All-in)</font>
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-07-2007, 12:40 AM
Scotty_12 Scotty_12 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Stoxpoker Coach
Posts: 1,282
Default Re: 27s: disagree with SNGPT?

I make similar plays. After the blinds pass we are left with a stack that, if we pick up AA, still only equals the 1575 we have now. I think its good to use the little FE that we have left, and just hope we dont run into an overpair if called, as A9/A7 shouldnt be calling.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-07-2007, 12:49 AM
SquishyPeach SquishyPeach is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Georgetown, Tx
Posts: 35
Default Re: 27s: disagree with SNGPT?

I could agree with the push...But I also think this sets up an interesting dynamic for the other players who could be calling way looser because of that same idea...I for one normally call short stacks who go all in UTG way looser than other pos.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-07-2007, 02:10 AM
skreemer7 skreemer7 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 301
Default Re: 27s: disagree with SNGPT?

[ QUOTE ]
I could agree with the push...But I also think this sets up an interesting dynamic for the other players who could be calling way looser because of that same idea...I for one normally call short stacks who go all in UTG way looser than other pos.

[/ QUOTE ]

So do I, but I still think you have to push this. That 79 is sooooooooooooooted baby!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-07-2007, 02:55 AM
PattdownManiac PattdownManiac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Punking Fools at Wendys?
Posts: 1,003
Default Re: 27s: disagree with SNGPT?

I make this push believing that the next hand is going to be more -ev than this push is -ev but I hope pudge or someone comes on here and sheds their thoughts.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-07-2007, 03:01 AM
Scotty_12 Scotty_12 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Stoxpoker Coach
Posts: 1,282
Default Re: 27s: disagree with SNGPT?

[ QUOTE ]
I hope pudge or someone comes on here and sheds their thoughts.

[/ QUOTE ]

I hope this in almost every thread
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-07-2007, 03:25 AM
Kevin8423 Kevin8423 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,640
Default Re: 27s: disagree with SNGPT?

I don't know if I like pushing this, you really don't need to get it in on your BB next hand if you fold. If you fold here, and get garbage for your BB and SB you're still left with 900, thats short in terms of BBs but if you double up you have a decent stack again. I think we can pretty easily find a better spot than this, if not in our blinds then in the next rotation even if we lose our FE.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-07-2007, 03:28 AM
PattdownManiac PattdownManiac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Punking Fools at Wendys?
Posts: 1,003
Default Re: 27s: disagree with SNGPT?

I said I shove this but I think in reality I actually fold it. It's weird looking at hand histories and thinking about what you'd do. So much different than acting in live game situation.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-07-2007, 03:51 AM
Jshuttlesworth Jshuttlesworth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,688
Default Re: 27s: disagree with SNGPT?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I hope pudge or someone comes on here and sheds their thoughts.

[/ QUOTE ]

I hope this in almost every thread

[/ QUOTE ]

QFT

[ QUOTE ]

I said I shove this but I think in reality I actually fold it. It's weird looking at hand histories and thinking about what you'd do. So much different than acting in live game situation.

[/ QUOTE ]


QFMFT
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-07-2007, 04:19 AM
PattdownManiac PattdownManiac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Punking Fools at Wendys?
Posts: 1,003
Default Re: 27s: disagree with SNGPT?

What is QFT.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.