The Universe in a Single Atom

[J. Stew]

Anybody read/listen to this? Pretty awesome bridge between science and what religion points to imo.

[flipdeadshot22]

link plz

[brandofo]

http://www.amazon.com/Universe-Singl.../dp/076792066X

[David Steele]

Does he give a scientific explanation for how his theory of reincarnation works?

D.

[brandofo]

Yes, that is outlined in Chapter 4.

[David Steele]

[ QUOTE ]
Yes, that is outlined in Chapter 4

[/ QUOTE ]

I am skeptical that this chapter 4 really contains a
scientific explanation of how reincarnation might work.

I'll check it out though, thanks.

D.

[latefordinner]

Buddhism has the characteristics of what would be expected in a cosmic religion for the future: It transcends a personal God, avoids dogmas and theology; it covers both the natural and spritual; and it is based on a religious sense aspiring from the experience of all things, natural and spiritual, as a meaningful unity...if there is any religion that would cope with modern scientific needs it would be Buddhism.

Einstein

[BigSoonerFan]

[ QUOTE ]
Anybody read/listen to this? Pretty awesome bridge between science and what religion points to imo.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think I first heard about this when watching 'Animal House'.

[arahant]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Yes, that is outlined in Chapter 4

[/ QUOTE ]

I am skeptical that this chapter 4 really contains a
scientific explanation of how reincarnation might work.

I'll check it out though, thanks.

D.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, nothing in chapter 4 about reincarnation. It only receives 2 pages in the index, and that passage doesn't say anything either.

I started with chapter 4, and have read a few other chapters, and my impressions are:

1) I like the Dalai Lama more. He's humble about what he knows, accepts anything science shows, and is very open to science proving tenets of Buddhism (or other beliefs) wrong. He's clearly not the smartest guy in the world, but has the opportunity to speak with a lot of brilliant scientists, and uses that opportunity to learn.

2) He feels consciousness can't be explored by current scientific methods, which isn't exactly true. Scientists already work in some of the ways he is suggesting. Still, he has done a great deal to encourage brain and mind and meditation research.

3) I haven't read the whole book, but he doesn't really seem to defend anything or make any claims. It's more of an homage to science from a religious guy, which is, of course, very nice.

[brandofo]

Sorry guys, I was just kidding about Chapter 4. I didn't think it was possible to provide a scientific explanation of reincarnation.