Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-01-2006, 04:54 PM
Abramovic Abramovic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: London
Posts: 2,667
Default Far too weak passive?

Should I have capped the flop and river?

Poker Room skin
Limit Holdem Ring game
Limit: $0.25/$0.5
10 players
Converter

Pre-flop: (10 players) Hero is UTG+2 with T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
2 folds, Hero calls, MP1 folds, MP2 calls, MP3 folds, CO calls, <font color="#cc0000">Button raises</font>, SB calls, BB calls, Hero calls, MP2 calls, CO calls.

Flop: 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (12SB, 6 players)
SB checks, BB checks, <font color="#cc0000">Hero bets</font>, MP2 folds, CO calls, <font color="#cc0000">Button raises</font>, 2 folds, Hero calls, CO calls.

Turn: A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (9BB, 3 players)
Hero checks, <font color="#cc0000">CO bets</font>, Button folds, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises</font>, CO calls.

River: 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (13BB, 2 players)
<font color="#cc0000">Hero bets</font>, <font color="#cc0000">CO raises</font>, Hero calls.

Results:
Final pot: 17BB
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-01-2006, 04:55 PM
Buzz-cp Buzz-cp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Getting heated & cooled...
Posts: 6,999
Default Re: Far too weak passive

don't cap flop, yes 3-bet river. Turn is muy excellente.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-01-2006, 05:06 PM
Smoke em' Smoke em' is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 132
Default Re: Far too weak passive

[ QUOTE ]
Should I have capped the flop and river?

Flop: 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (12SB, 6 players)
SB checks, BB checks, <font color="#cc0000">Hero bets</font>, MP2 folds, CO calls, <font color="#cc0000">Button raises</font>, 2 folds, Hero calls, CO calls.


[/ QUOTE ]

No, you played this correctly.

[ QUOTE ]

Turn: A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (9BB, 3 players)
Hero checks, <font color="#cc0000">CO bets</font>, Button folds, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises</font>, CO calls.


[/ QUOTE ]

I think this c/r is probably -EV, but somebody else should probably confirm that if true.

[ QUOTE ]

River: 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (13BB, 2 players)
<font color="#cc0000">Hero bets</font>, <font color="#cc0000">CO raises</font>, Hero calls.


[/ QUOTE ]

What are you afraid of on this river? Unless you have a read that CO is so passive he would never raise without the nuts there is a really good chance that you're ahead. Worse hands will still call or raise your 3-bet, so 3-bet it and hope to see it capped.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-01-2006, 05:10 PM
Bona Bona is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Playing with chips\'n stuff
Posts: 1,504
Default Re: Far too weak passive

* Grunch*

If he has the nut flush he 3 bets the turn right? So the 3 probably made his straight. I think you have to 3 bet the river and call a cap.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-01-2006, 05:12 PM
Ampelmann Ampelmann is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: lol donkaments
Posts: 1,652
Default Re: Far too weak passive

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Turn: A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (9BB, 3 players)
Hero checks, <font color="#cc0000">CO bets</font>, Button folds, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises</font>, CO calls.


[/ QUOTE ]
I think this c/r is probably -EV, but somebody else should probably confirm that if true.

[/ QUOTE ]
Hero has the 2nd nuts. How can anything be -EV here?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-01-2006, 05:13 PM
shadeball shadeball is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 22
Default Re: Far too weak passive

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Turn: A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (9BB, 3 players)
Hero checks, <font color="#cc0000">CO bets</font>, Button folds, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises</font>, CO calls.


[/ QUOTE ]

I think this c/r is probably -EV, but somebody else should probably confirm that if true.


[/ QUOTE ]

Why do you think this is -ev?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-01-2006, 05:22 PM
Sushiglutton Sushiglutton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Searching for fish
Posts: 2,048
Default Re: Far too weak passive?

Flop is fine 3-handed OOP. Cap river.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-01-2006, 05:27 PM
RemyXO RemyXO is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Saving Fuzzy Kittens
Posts: 1,112
Default Re: Far too weak passive

** GRUNCH **

Preflop: QTs is a little too weak a hand for me to open at UTG+2, unless the table pretty loose passive. Did you cringe when the button raised?

Flop: Pretty darn goo flop, did you deal it yourself? Now, you are on a close to nut flush draw. You are 2:1 against hitting it on the river. You have 35% chance to win it. Therefore - if it's more than two opponents in the hand, you shold choose the strategy to maximize the amount of money that goes into the pot. I love your bet there. When the button raises and comes back to you, there are EXACTLY two oppenents left. Your reraise will most definitely knock out the cutoff, and you are left with 50% pot equity and 35% odds. Not what you want ... definitely call, not a raise. Note that if a couple of more people called the button's raise, it would have been correct to reraise.

TURN: C/R is good, since betting out will knock out both opponents more often than not.

RIVER: Cap the sucker, no question about that. There are only two hands you are losing to - straight flush and king-high flush. Stop seeing monsters and cap. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-01-2006, 05:28 PM
Smoke em' Smoke em' is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 132
Default Re: Far too weak passive

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

I think this c/r is probably -EV, but somebody else should probably confirm that if true.

[/ QUOTE ]
Hero has the 2nd nuts. How can anything be -EV here?

[/ QUOTE ]

Errrr... That's what I said but not what I meant.

I think the c/r is worse than betting although obviously not -EV. There's too good of a chance of it being checked through behind him. If the button was looking for a free card, OP just granted his wish. If button is playing aggressively, OP might get a raise out of him and be able to 3-bet.

So although the c/r worked out fine, I think the better play is to bet out on the turn and 3-bet button's raise.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-01-2006, 06:10 PM
Gap23Razor Gap23Razor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lost in though
Posts: 637
Default Re: Far too weak passive?

river--cap yes, you have 2nd nut flush and it seems likely the villian has a straight...

flop--cap no, you have about 10 outs to win i think...9 for the flush, but i would shave off an out for the 8 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]--so make that 8 outs for the flush, also Q or T you can give yourself an out or two--so you have anywhere from 10-12 outs i would estimate---i am sure some people will disagree...i typically do not give a 3 full outs to over cards as someone may hold two pair or trips--maybe too conservative.

But with 47 cards yet to show, you would need about 16 outs to justify raising---you are getting 2 to 1 on just that bet only assuming CO would call, and i think he would as he called once already and the pot is grown big...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.