Is medium stakes poker even beatable with a rake.

acesinurface4 · #1 07-08-2006, 09:58 AM

So far at the new rakefee site, wsex, i'm up 300 bucks and have saved 2090 dollars in rake fees. And i play at almost a semi pro level. So my conclusion that people are wasting their money if u have to pay rake to play medium stakes.

I think people should wake up and smell the coffee.. support wsex and have a chance at really winning for a change.

Do u think that medium stakes is even marginally beatable long term with a standard rake?

Grey · #2 07-08-2006, 10:01 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Moderator(s) notified In a moment you will be automatically returned to the forum.

[/ QUOTE ]

If it's not spam, then it belongs in the "beginner's" forum or something.

Edit: yes, it's beatable.

kitaristi0 · #3 07-08-2006, 10:43 AM

No.

bent96 · #4 07-08-2006, 10:52 AM

Do you even need to ask? Of course not.

r3vbr · #5 07-08-2006, 11:41 AM

I have a friend who knows a friend who's up 150 dollars over the long term at NL200. But i don't know if that's true, i dont really believe people can win over the long haul also, the house always wins

vanHelsing · #6 07-08-2006, 12:40 PM

playing raked medium stakes is always =

Arito · #7 07-08-2006, 01:08 PM

My sarcasm detector is going off, do I need to fix it?

aejones · #8 07-08-2006, 01:40 PM

I'm a calling station and I go on tilt all the time, but I've beat "medium stakes poker" like a redheaded stepchild over 100,000 hands. Maybe this is just a lucky upswing.

downtown · #9 07-08-2006, 01:44 PM

So far this month I have paid Party Poker almost $1300 in rake. I am up in arms about what to do, I will never see that money again!

Gregg777 · #10 07-08-2006, 02:20 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I think people should wake up and smell the coffee.. support wsex and have a chance at really winning for a change.

[/ QUOTE ]

We have awakened, but WPEX does not have NL short handed.