|
|
#61
04-13-2006, 05:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: a little wrinkle to the discussion:
[ QUOTE ]
man u really don't read well do you? english is not your first language clearly. BTW using P5s as "unanimous" evidence of a fold really doesn't convince me. That forum is almost unanimous in it being a fold. notice the word THAT in front of the sentence? It means almost all of the responses on P5s say fold. that is a far far cry from me saying there is "unanimous evidence" for a fold. -Scott [/ QUOTE ] Just stop. 
|
|
#62
04-13-2006, 06:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: a little wrinkle to the discussion:
Here is a fact. You are ahead of villains range here. His range could be as wide as any 2 if he's nutso, if he's just a loose pusher its Ax, any pair, any 2 broadway etc. If he's a normal pusher, his range is most aces, suited broadways, pairs, etc.
So if one of the fold advocates would like to say that his real range is AJ+ 88+ or soemthing like that, then well, sure.
|
|
#63
04-13-2006, 06:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: a little wrinkle to the discussion:
[ QUOTE ]
man u really don't read well do you? english is not your first language clearly. BTW using P5s as "unanimous" evidence of a fold really doesn't convince me. That forum is almost unanimous in it being a fold. notice the word THAT in front of the sentence? It means almost all of the responses on P5s say fold. that is a far far cry from me saying there is "unanimous evidence" for a fold. -Scott [/ QUOTE ] Ok, I apparently have to rewrite my statement for you, since reading it twice didn't help you, I guess. Amended statement below: Stating that P5s is nearly unanimous in support of a fold and using that as evidence that this situation is, in fact, a fold does not convince me that AQ should be folded here.
|
|
#64
04-13-2006, 06:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: a little wrinkle to the discussion:
[ QUOTE ]
Here is a fact. You are ahead of villains range here. His range could be as wide as any 2 if he's nutso, if he's just a loose pusher its Ax, any pair, any 2 broadway etc. If he's a normal pusher, his range is most aces, suited broadways, pairs, etc. So if one of the fold advocates would like to say that his real range is AJ+ 88+ or soemthing like that, then well, sure. [/ QUOTE ] I understand all the range of hands issues. But is this a spot where I'm better off not risking 1/2 of a huge stack, and picking better spots to continue to accumulate? with 3rd place stack people fear me and I should be able to bully the table with near impunity. with a below avg stack that is no longer the case. -Scott
|
|
#66
04-13-2006, 06:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: a little wrinkle to the discussion:
[ QUOTE ]
But is this a spot where I'm better off not risking 1/2 of a huge stack, and picking better spots to continue to accumulate? with 3rd place stack people fear me and I should be able to bully the table with near impunity. with a below avg stack that is no longer the case. -Scott [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, that monster stack you have of 20x BB is soooooo scawy to everyone. -ActionBob
|
|
#67
04-13-2006, 07:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: a little wrinkle to the discussion:
[ QUOTE ]
But is this a spot where I'm better off not risking 1/2 of a huge stack, and picking better spots to continue to accumulate? [/ QUOTE ] We understand what you're asking and as a forum we have repeatedly (and pretty much unanimously) answered NO. Would you like to ask the question again?
|
|
#70
04-14-2006, 01:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: a little wrinkle to the discussion:
The p5's thread is here if anyone's interested. I'm about to read it but was curious...sobedude, are you nsxt2?
edit: Next time I'll read the thread first...forget my question. edit2: If AQ is an "absolutely INSTAFOLD" for nsxt2, wtf is his calling range? He must get absolutely run over late in tourneys...and yet I know he's a successful player so that must not be the case...someone explain. Steve
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
