|
|
#31
01-12-2006, 01:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokerstars RNG (not a rigged post)
[ QUOTE ]
jackaaron...  [/ QUOTE ] So, not only do flamers think that battered women are funny, they like to threaten me because I won't back down. Because I've been misunderstood by people that only want to hear what they want to hear, you have idiots like this who post pictures of battered women. Nice, dude. Did your dad beat your mom? 
|
|
#32
01-12-2006, 01:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pokerstars RNG (not a rigged post)
All I asked was a simple question folks.
I'll rephrase the same question, "can the "math" related to the RNG and all it's components get screwed up with a higher population of players (say 60k+) at a site?" Simple, very simple question. Stars can get the most traffic, it seems (I don't play PP), and you hear the most complaints of beats on Stars. Faulty logical connection? Fine. Say so. Why flame when you can post intelligently (since this is the most intelligent forum on the net with regard to poker)? It's just a simple question.
|
|
#33
01-12-2006, 01:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pokerstars RNG (not a rigged post)
Yes, there is a vast conspiracy against you. All of 2+2 is rigged to flame you. The 20 (+1 now) people here who think this post is ridiculous and pointless are ALL wrong and have a personal vendetta against you.
BTW, your question about the RNG was answered on page 1. Can we just move along now?
|
|
#34
01-12-2006, 01:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pokerstars RNG (not a rigged post)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] jackaaron... [/ QUOTE ] So, not only do flamers think that battered women are funny, they like to threaten me because I won't back down. Because I've been misunderstood by people that only want to hear what they want to hear, you have idiots like this who post pictures of battered women. Nice, dude. Did your dad beat your mom? [/ QUOTE ] Wow, you are devoid of a sense of humor. If you have been posting here or lurking long enough you should realize that any post discussing even the "possible" rigged-"ness" of a particular site will always be flamed. I agree some people here are a little quick to flame. But i can't imagine you believing that there would be a serious discussion about whether stars is more rigged, or unintentionally rigged due to some various factors. Stars, party, full tilt etc are not rigged in anyway period. This forum will never entertain a discussion regarding these sites being rigged in any form simply because its a ludicrous notion and something that has never been proven. Simply saying that this is not a rigged post and that you don't think its rigged, won't allow you to escape from the inevitable flamings.
|
|
#35
01-12-2006, 01:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pokerstars RNG (not a rigged post)
Furthermore, it has been mentioned numerous times in the past that "rigged" posts or things of that nature are, in general, detrimental to the so-called "poker economy." Think about it: The good/expert/experienced players know better, so they will ignore such notions. But what if the fish/less-experienced players came to believe that the games were rigged or in some way not "fair?" It couldn't possibly be good for the rest of us. I believe this is, in part, a sufficient explanation for why you (OP) and anyone else who posts topics of this nature would be flamed almost instantly.
|
|
#36
01-12-2006, 02:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pokerstars RNG (not a rigged post)
[ QUOTE ]
Simply saying that this is not a rigged post and that you don't think its rigged, won't allow you to escape from the inevitable flamings. [/ QUOTE ] So, even though I think it's not rigged, and I say I don't think it's rigged not only in the header, but even in my post that I don't think they're rigged, you still think that I think it's rigged? ...lol. Amazing.
|
|
#37
01-12-2006, 02:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pokerstars RNG (not a rigged post)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Simply saying that this is not a rigged post and that you don't think its rigged, won't allow you to escape from the inevitable flamings. [/ QUOTE ] So, even though I think it's not rigged, and I say I don't think it's rigged not only in the header, but even in my post that I don't think they're rigged, you still think that I think it's rigged? ...lol. Amazing. [/ QUOTE ] You just don't get it, do you? You claim to not think that it's rigged, but the very issue you describe dances around the idea that there is something rigged about Stars, even though you don't use those exact words.
|
|
#39
01-12-2006, 02:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pokerstars RNG (not a rigged post)
[ QUOTE ]
Wow, you are devoid of a sense of humor. [/ QUOTE ] Well, I don't particularly find humor about battered women funny either, but that's not the point. The OP put "(not a rigged post)" in the topic header. He didn't put "(I don't think it's rigged)", but he talked about his friends thinking that it's rigged because of the number of 2 or 3 outers. The OP is on crack. 'Nuff said. That's why he's getting flames for putting a rigged post in a topic where he claims it's not a rigged post. So while he might not think it's rigged, it's still a damn rigged post.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
