Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Poker > Other Poker Games
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 12-03-2006, 01:32 PM
*TT* *TT* is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Vehicle Chooser For Life!
Posts: 17,198
Default Re: So uh, how bad is the variance supposed to be at 2-7?

[ QUOTE ]
Even worse than razz

[/ QUOTE ]

My Razz game stats show that its the lowest variance game that I play. I am 5 bb/100 over 17k or so hands, thats a sick winrate!

TT
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 12-04-2006, 02:29 AM
Tornado69 Tornado69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 807
Default Re: So uh, how bad is the variance supposed to be at 2-7?

I guess it just seems that your either hitting your hands or your not. Your either on a rush or about to throw your cat against the wall when playing both of these games. Where the hell you got that winrate at ? Stars or Full Tilt ?
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 12-04-2006, 03:16 AM
*TT* *TT* is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Vehicle Chooser For Life!
Posts: 17,198
Default Re: So uh, how bad is the variance supposed to be at 2-7?

[ QUOTE ]
I guess it just seems that your either hitting your hands or your not. Your either on a rush or about to throw your cat against the wall when playing both of these games. Where the hell you got that winrate at ? Stars or Full Tilt ?

[/ QUOTE ]

I disagree... if you only continue past 4th street with the best of it, you wont be throwing too many cats at the wall. Stars for the most part, but Full Tilt plays the same from what I noticed.

TT [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 12-04-2006, 04:36 AM
Anacardo Anacardo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: gorieslayer, Brightensbane
Posts: 7,014
Default Re: So uh, how bad is the variance supposed to be at 2-7?

Gentlemen:

This evening I played 10/20 2-7 TD at Ultimate Bet HU and 3-handed, losing, then making back, ~$1K in the process.

Bonus money cleared: $10.

Swingy format, IMO.

TT (is it customary to include the asterisks?) - it would please me very much to see this phrase -

[ QUOTE ]
you wont be throwing too many cats at the wall.

[/ QUOTE ]

become a 2+2 staple. Will you join me in trying to ensure that this happens?
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 12-04-2006, 11:17 AM
Tom Bayes Tom Bayes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 891
Default Re: So uh, how bad is the variance supposed to be at 2-7?

I thought the variance in 2-7 this past weekend was good, not bad [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

I'll probably be back in a few days singing a different tune.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 12-04-2006, 07:46 PM
Guruman Guruman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: still a NL fish - so lay off!
Posts: 3,704
Default Re: So uh, how bad is the variance supposed to be at 2-7?

[ QUOTE ]
I guess it just seems that your either hitting your hands or your not. Your either on a rush or about to throw your cat against the wall when playing both of these games. Where the hell you got that winrate at ? Stars or Full Tilt ?

[/ QUOTE ]

I think that the good tripledraw players are more adept at interpreting the texture of the remaining deck than the rest of us. They can properly estimate how many outs are dead, they remember which good cards they threw away and can estimate when others are drawing dead against them, etc.

There's more science to this game yet.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.