|
|
#11
04-07-2006, 11:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $11 -- PP Level 2, JJ : Call the push reraise from tilty LAG?
[ QUOTE ]
Why do you want to eliminate weak aces, considering you are 70% against them? [/ QUOTE ] Good point, but do I really want 3-4 more callers who really like the pot odds being laid out by from flat calling the minraise? 
|
|
#12
04-07-2006, 11:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $11 -- PP Level 2, JJ : Call the push reraise from tilty LAG?
Meh, no, but do you really want 3-4 callers (which is still likely at an $11) if you re-raise and then face a flop of KT4 with half of your stack in the pot?
|
|
#14
04-07-2006, 11:10 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $11 -- PP Level 2, JJ : Call the push reraise from tilty LAG?
It would be far better to reraise from the button, say, because if you reraise and are called (because you are still in early/mid position), your position on the flop's going to be nasty. That's why I wouldn't reraise here, not because of the strength of your hand or the fact his minraise is pathetic (which of course it is).
Bad luck in running into QQ, but I still think you made the right call.
|
|
#15
04-07-2006, 11:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $11 -- PP Level 2, JJ : Call the push reraise from tilty LAG?
I'd just flat call PF and double up post flop.
It would take a pretty solid read here, but I dislike getting it all in pf in l1 with JJ. But yah, if he is dumb enough to be doing this with like 66+ then I'd call but racing against overcards at this point isn't what you should be looking for.
|
|
#16
04-07-2006, 01:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $11 -- PP Level 2, JJ : Call the push reraise from tilty LAG?
[ QUOTE ]
But yah, if he is dumb enough to be doing this with like 66+ then I'd call but racing against overcards at this point isn't what you should be looking for. [/ QUOTE ] Uhh, I would gladly race against overcards at this point. Easily. However, you have to factor in the fact he could have QQ, KK, and AA as well. This is why I fold. If he showed me overcards, I would call.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
