|
|
#11
10-24-2007, 03:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Re-opening the raising in NLHE cash game
NL is a full bet so to reopen for the previous callers it would have to have been raised to $200. In LHE it would have to have been made $150 or better.
|
|
#12
10-24-2007, 04:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re-opening the raising in NLHE cash game
[ QUOTE ]
NL is a full bet so to reopen for the previous callers it would have to have been raised to $200. In LHE it would have to have been made $150 or better. [/ QUOTE ] Doubt it. There is no structure in a limit game that would allow for the following with 4 players in the pot. Not possible for 4 people to be in the pot in a limit game, with $80 in preflop, then someone would bet 100 on the flop. See below for clarification. [ QUOTE ] there was $80 in the pot. Player A opened for $100. B called, and C shoved for a total of $145 [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#13
10-25-2007, 04:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re-opening the raising in NLHE cash game
The rule varies by house. One vegas room uses the full bet rule because they have the tda rules posted and they want the cash game rules to match (to prevent confusion). I like this way, but it's no biggie either way, you just need to clarify the house rules where you play.
|
|
#14
10-25-2007, 07:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re-opening the raising in NLHE cash game
I am reading that Player D has yet to act at all yet and wants to know if he can raise. How does an all-in throttle his ability to act in any manner he chooses? are you telling me he can only call at this point?
Explain
|
|
#16
10-25-2007, 08:24 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re-opening the raising in NLHE cash game
[ QUOTE ]
Don't want to hijack, but what if A bets 100, B calls, C shoves for 145, and D shoves for 210? Can A raise now? Assume the full bet rule. [/ QUOTE ] Yes, this would reopen the betting. 210 is more than 100% of 100. The inbetween player doesn't matter here.
|
|
#17
10-25-2007, 09:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re-opening the raising in NLHE cash game
[ QUOTE ]
I am reading that Player D has yet to act at all yet and wants to know if he can raise. How does an all-in throttle his ability to act in any manner he chooses? are you telling me he can only call at this point? Explain [/ QUOTE ] No, player D was asking what the options were as it relates to player B who merely called. D was worried that if he called and C's raise reopened the betting, that Player B could then shove. It turns out the house rule is 1/2 raise reopens the betting (and as others said house rules trump all)... I was just curious how common the 1/2 rule is. Apparently there's enough use of it to be somewhat common. --Headhunter
|
|
#18
10-25-2007, 01:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re-opening the raising in NLHE cash game
The most common rule is that it is a half-raise for limit holdem and a full raise for NL.
While the house can certainly make whatever rule it likes, I feel a lot of floors/cardrooms/dealers etc. might just use the half-raise for all games out of either simplicity or laziness, take your pick.
|
|
#19
10-25-2007, 03:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re-opening the raising in NLHE cash game
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I am reading that Player D has yet to act at all yet and wants to know if he can raise. How does an all-in throttle his ability to act in any manner he chooses? are you telling me he can only call at this point? Explain [/ QUOTE ] No, player D was asking what the options were as it relates to player B who merely called. D was worried that if he called and C's raise reopened the betting, that Player B could then shove. It turns out the house rule is 1/2 raise reopens the betting (and as others said house rules trump all)... I was just curious how common the 1/2 rule is. Apparently there's enough use of it to be somewhat common. --Headhunter [/ QUOTE ] That makes sense, i just mis-inferred players D's intent.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
