Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > STT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-07-2007, 04:59 AM
Weatherhead03 Weatherhead03 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kamloops BC
Posts: 1,533
Default Re: 27s: disagree with SNGPT?

[ QUOTE ]
What is QFT.

[/ QUOTE ]
Quoted for truth.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-07-2007, 07:44 AM
ryanghall ryanghall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,789
Default Re: 27s: disagree with SNGPT?

Easy push IMO

Ryan
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-07-2007, 08:40 AM
SuitedSixes SuitedSixes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Buy shrits!
Posts: 4,810
Default Re: 27s: disagree with SNGPT?

[ QUOTE ]
SNGPT has this as an obvious fold for any reasonable ranges (it's in the -1% range), but I think this push is reasonable because we will be forced to call a lot of marginal hand from the BB next time. Thoughts?

PokerStars Tournament, Big Blind is t400 with t25 antes (5 handed) Converter on pregopoker.com

Hero (t1575)
CO (t1895)
Button (t3515)
SB (t3840)
BB (t2675)

Preflop: Hero is in UTG with 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]
<font color="red">Hero raises to t1550 (All-in)</font>

[/ QUOTE ]

This is an auto any two card shove for me, because the next hand will be an auto any two card call for me, so let's take advantage of any FE we might have (which is bolstered by the fact that we are pushing from UTG, even though many of us will assign a wider range to a SS UTG shover, many of the horrible players we see don't).
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-07-2007, 09:51 AM
Insty Insty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: supernit with no sense of humor.
Posts: 908
Default Re: 27s: disagree with SNGPT?

[ QUOTE ]

This is an auto any two card shove for me, because the next hand will be an auto any two card call for me, so let's take advantage of any FE we might have (which is bolstered by the fact that we are pushing from UTG, even though many of us will assign a wider range to a SS UTG shover, many of the horrible players we see don't).

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-07-2007, 09:56 AM
TwistedEcho TwistedEcho is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,913
Default Re: 27s: disagree with SNGPT?

SNGPT says its a push if i have two of them on 22+,A2s+,A3o+,KTs+,KJo+,QJs and the other two 44+,A7s+,A9o+,KJs+
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-07-2007, 10:01 AM
vipon vipon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 115
Default Re: 27s: disagree with SNGPT?

Can anyone break down the logic of the push here with that junk?
Ive been SNGing for awhile and would never push witht aht crap....but that might explain why lately ive been losing..
WVj
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-07-2007, 12:09 PM
Pudge714 Pudge714 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Black Kelly Holcomb
Posts: 13,713
Default Re: 27s: disagree with SNGPT?

SHOOOOOOOOOOOVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEE
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-07-2007, 12:37 PM
Mojo56 Mojo56 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 133
Default Re: 27s: disagree with SNGPT?

Easy fold for me.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-07-2007, 01:08 PM
Guthrie Guthrie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Underground
Posts: 2,871
Default Re: 27s: disagree with SNGPT?

[ QUOTE ]
Can anyone break down the logic of the push here with that junk?
Ive been SNGing for awhile and would never push witht aht crap....but that might explain why lately ive been losing..
WVj

[/ QUOTE ]
I think SuitedSixes nailed the logic.

If you push this UTG, some of your opponents will guess that you are pushing junk out of desperation, and call. Some of them will think you have a monster, otherwise you wouldn't be stupid enough to push UTG. Some are just waiting for you to blind out. Some just don't want to get involved. So pushing has at least a reasonable chance of picking up the blinds.

On the very next hand the tables have turned. Maybe you'll catch a monster, or maybe you'll have 72o and someone has absolutely pushed on you.

Would you rather have all your chips in with 97s and at least some chance of everyone folding, or would you rather have your chips in with a random hand and definitely go to showdown?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-07-2007, 01:52 PM
Jshuttlesworth Jshuttlesworth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,688
Default Re: 27s: disagree with SNGPT?

[ QUOTE ]

This is an auto any two card shove for me, because the next hand will be an auto any two card call for me, so let's take advantage of any FE we might have (which is bolstered by the fact that we are pushing from UTG, even though many of us will assign a wider range to a SS UTG shover, many of the horrible players we see don't).

[/ QUOTE ]

nice, ok. thanks.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.