Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 02-14-2007, 10:16 PM
NajdorfDefense NajdorfDefense is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 8,227
Default Re: A guys v. girls sports debate

Episcopal would have slaughtered any women's team.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-14-2007, 11:03 PM
SomethingClever SomethingClever is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Viva Robusto! (new 11/26)
Posts: 10,278
Default Re: A guys v. girls sports debate

I'm pretty sure the team at my high school would have beaten any WNBA team.

We did have Mike Doleac and Matt Santangelo though.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-14-2007, 11:31 PM
MCS MCS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Brooklyn! What!
Posts: 5,447
Default Re: A guys v. girls sports debate

I'd take the women's team by a moderate amount.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-15-2007, 12:32 AM
antidan444 antidan444 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The village nice guy
Posts: 8,143
Default Re: A guys v. girls sports debate

[ QUOTE ]
A very good HS boys team will beat any women's college team. For example, my HS won the Pennyslvania AAAA Championship last year. AAAA is the largest division. That team had two kids who are now playing significant time in DI this year as freshman. A HS team like that would simply be too strong and athletic for the women.

[/ QUOTE ]

QFT. I've seen Harrisburg play (a very strong Pa. AAAA team) and I have to believe they would beat any college women's team just because of the size/strength/athleticism edges.

That being said, I could see the Duke women beating a Pa. Class AA middle-of-the-road team relatively easily. I guess that's be the best comparison to New York Class B, which I'm not familiar with.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-15-2007, 12:51 AM
DrewDevil DrewDevil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,715
Default Re: A guys v. girls sports debate

You guys are all severely underestimating how bad women suck at sports. Seriously. I worked in sports media for several years and the Texas women's team had a bunch of student manager scrubs that they used to scrimmage against. The guys would beat the women every time if they didn't hold back, and the Texas women were in the top 10 at the time.

Any decent high school boys' team would destroy a team of WNBA all-stars 100 times out of 100. Hell, pick 5 guys off the court at just about any decent pickup court in a big city and they'd run the WNBAers off the court.

There's simply no comparison.

When Chris Evert was a dominant #1 women's player, she was married for a time to John Lloyd, a pro men's player. He was usually ranked between 150th and 250th in the world, and I don't believe he ever was ranked higher than 100th. They used to play competitive tennis at least once a week, best 2 out of 3 sets, at full strength.

Do you know how many times she beat him? Zero. Never. In fact, she said she never really came close.

There is a vas deferens between men's and women's sports.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-15-2007, 01:29 AM
UATrewqaz UATrewqaz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 5,542
Default Re: A guys v. girls sports debate

The worst thing about watching women's sports (if you are ever subjected to such misery) is the utter lack of fire and grit they show. They barely even look like they care what the score is or who wins. When down 20 points, some girl makes a little layup and her teammates all surround her high fiving and woo'ing like they all accomplished something.

A+ in encouraging of teammates
F in any and ever other category you can think of
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-15-2007, 01:34 AM
AngusThermopyle AngusThermopyle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Riding Binky toward Ankh-Morpork
Posts: 4,366
Default Re: A guys v. girls sports debate

[ QUOTE ]
When down 20 points, some guy makes a little dunk and his teammates all surround him high fiving and woo'ing like they all accomplished something.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry, this would never happen in men's sports.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-15-2007, 01:36 AM
UATrewqaz UATrewqaz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 5,542
Default Re: A guys v. girls sports debate

It happens, but much more rarely. Girls have a pep ralley after every made free throw.

It's every bit as stupid in guy's sports too. Like when a guy gets a sack down 40 points and does his little sack dance.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-15-2007, 02:15 AM
Thremp Thremp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Free Kyleb
Posts: 10,163
Default Re: A guys v. girls sports debate

2 levels of talent rule:

High School -> College -> Pro

Take a woman's pro team and let them grind it out against a high school team.


If I was only a girl, I'd be playing soccer at UNC. Beat: I'd likely be a dyke.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-15-2007, 12:03 PM
cognito20 cognito20 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 392
Default Re: A guys v. girls sports debate

[ QUOTE ]
You guys are all severely underestimating how bad women suck at sports. Seriously. I worked in sports media for several years and the Texas women's team had a bunch of student manager scrubs that they used to scrimmage against. The guys would beat the women every time if they didn't hold back, and the Texas women were in the top 10 at the time.

Any decent high school boys' team would destroy a team of WNBA all-stars 100 times out of 100. Hell, pick 5 guys off the court at just about any decent pickup court in a big city and they'd run the WNBAers off the court.

There's simply no comparison.

When Chris Evert was a dominant #1 women's player, she was married for a time to John Lloyd, a pro men's player. He was usually ranked between 150th and 250th in the world, and I don't believe he ever was ranked higher than 100th. They used to play competitive tennis at least once a week, best 2 out of 3 sets, at full strength.

Do you know how many times she beat him? Zero. Never. In fact, she said she never really came close.

There is a vas deferens between men's and women's sports.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's not quite the same issue though. Chris Evert's husband, although he was not a very good pro, was a pro nevertheless. I am not disputing whether a professional male athlete, however marginal, could take out the world's best woman. Of course he could. Make the question "could Chris Evert in her prime beat a state boys high school tennis champion (or maybe the Division III NCAA men's champion)?" and it becomes a lot more interesting, and the answer not quite as pat. I suppose in the case of the above question, knowing the state the guy was the HS champion of would make a big difference, as the Florida, Texas, and California state champions >>>>>>>> in quality over New York, New Hampshire, North Dakota state champions due to climate, training opportunities, etc.

--Scott
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.