Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Did this suck?
Big hairy dog balls 10 27.78%
execution was poor 4 11.11%
:heart: Shajen 16 44.44%
You suck. 6 16.67%
Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-27-2006, 03:44 AM
rothko rothko is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: nowhere, really
Posts: 5,437
Default Re: DN loses respect for Raymer

[ QUOTE ]
With this lawsuit, these 7 plaintiffs may end up helping to destroy the American online poker world that has made them all rich and famous.

[/ QUOTE ]

you, sir, are brilliant.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-27-2006, 03:52 AM
KOTLP KOTLP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,987
Default Re: DN loses respect for Raymer

What's up with the Hachem slam? I guess Daniel's saying he is naive. I bet Joe at least went to college.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-27-2006, 05:13 AM
alphatmw alphatmw is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,348
Default Re: DN loses respect for Raymer

i dunno.... raymer explcitly stated he saw no way for online poker to enter into this lawsuit, and now it has. does anyone who supported the lawsuit before still feel that strongly about it?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-27-2006, 05:21 AM
Burno Burno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Self-Actualizing
Posts: 1,598
Default Re: DN loses respect for Raymer

[ QUOTE ]
With this lawsuit, these 7 plaintiffs may end up helping to destroy the American online poker world that has made them all rich and famous.

[/ QUOTE ]


"Matt, Matt, Matt. You don't know the history of psychiatry. I do."
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-27-2006, 05:34 AM
maurile maurile is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,173
Default Re: DN loses respect for Raymer

[ QUOTE ]
i dunno.... raymer explcitly stated he saw no way for online poker to enter into this lawsuit, and now it has.

[/ QUOTE ]
No it hasn't. The defendent pled something about it in its answer. That doesn't mean anything. You can plead anything you want in an answer. There's no penalty for saying stuff that's completely irrelevant or bogus, and most of the content of an answer typically bears little resemblance to the reality of the lawsuit.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-27-2006, 09:56 AM
KAknight KAknight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 513
Default Re: DN loses respect for Raymer

I believe the lawsuit is a good thing and the players are right for doing it. The only thing they are trying to do is protect player's rights.

If you ever play in a WPT event the waiver you have to sign says that the WPT has a right to use your image however they want forever. This means that that they can put your face on any WPT product they currently have, or any product they make in the future.

Lets's say you wake up one day and you are Greg Raymer. You have a million fans and where ever you go women throw their underwear at you. You hire people (at great expense)to come out with a poker video game where you can play heads up against a video game version of yourself.

Two weeks before your video game comes out, you go to the store and on the shelf is a WPT video game that has your picture on the front and says you can play heads up against Greg Raymer. Is that fair to you? Just because you put up your own money to enter a tourney that the WPT happened to be filming?

Also while you are at the store, you see a WPT brand anal lube with your face on it, WPT brand sex toy (with your face on it), a WPT brand flag burning kit (with your face on it), and a WPT brand "How to cheat at poker" book with your face on the cover.

Is that fair?

Right now, the WPT could legally do all of those things because of that release. The players did ask the WPT to change the release, but the WPT told them to buzz off.

These 7 players are using their own money to try and get this changed. They are doing this to protect the rights of all current and future poker players, Daniel Negreanu included. Daniel does not seem to grasp this point.

The largest point that no one seems to be making is that if the WPT would just agree to rewrite the waiver and spell out exactly what the WPT could use the they player's image for (commericals and full season DVDs) then this whole issue would go away.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-27-2006, 10:00 AM
Masquerade Masquerade is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 652
Default Re: DN loses respect for Raymer

[ QUOTE ]
Who are the seven, specifically?

[/ QUOTE ]

Chubby, Aussie, Tilty, Whiney, Brainy, Hairy and Prof.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-27-2006, 10:09 AM
chicagoY chicagoY is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago, USA
Posts: 2,534
Default Re: DN loses respect for Raymer

They are 9, and they have already left from Mordor.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-27-2006, 10:16 AM
Dexter_Cain Dexter_Cain is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 237
Default Re: DN loses respect for Raymer

"Matt, Matt, Matt. You don't know the history of psychiatry. I do."

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-27-2006, 10:37 AM
Daliman Daliman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Wongs are two things, (at least).
Posts: 10,376
Default Re: DN loses respect for Raymer

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
With this lawsuit, these 7 plaintiffs may end up helping to destroy the American online poker world that has made them all rich and famous.

[/ QUOTE ]


"Matt, Matt, Matt. You don't know the history of psychiatry. I do."

[/ QUOTE ]
Burno, you're being glib.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.