![]() |
|
#121
|
|||
|
|||
|
joe,
wtf is a "sharkscope" roi as opposed to a "roi"? also, roi doesn't include rakeback, though a case could in theory be made for it to do so in stars land. joe, what was your 530s roi? c |
|
#122
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
joe, that's some pretty pussy [censored] man, if you don't mind me saying so. that's nothing even remotely close to what you said you were going to do. also, i expect that you mean something like "amongst games with buins over $400" or something like that? i don't think we're going to get a huge number of 1ks or even 555s going in the long run here. citanul [/ QUOTE ] Well we could work something else out, but i figured we'd have to use sharkscope to make sure i didnt cheat, and that is what sharkscope uses. How is that pussy [censored]. 5% roi at the 500s and 1ks is pretty [censored] good, im just saying thta sharkscope will have my average buy in be lower bc maybe those high stakes games dont run as much so ill have to play 300s |
|
#123
|
|||
|
|||
|
joe,
it's pussy because your original claim was 10%. 5% is way less than 10%. if you play 300s, you play 300s, those lower your average buyin. it's not just on sharkscope... doesn't sharkscope track the games, and give you rois for each buyin? c |
|
#124
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is a fanboy's worst nightmare. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
|
|
#125
|
|||
|
|||
|
my 530 speed roi was about 15% over 1800, I went on a bad run on my last 400 or so i believe partly bc that was when party announced they were closing so i was 18 tabling on both party and stars and im pretty sure that messed me up horribly. But even if you include those last 400 tournaments my roi is 10.7% over 2139 (thats not including rakeback, which would then bump both those numbers up another 1.7%)
|
|
#126
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
joe, it's pussy because your original claim was 10%. 5% is way less than 10%. if you play 300s, you play 300s, those lower your average buyin. it's not just on sharkscope... doesn't sharkscope track the games, and give you rois for each buyin? c [/ QUOTE ] I dont subscribe to sharkscope so i dont know, if they did then sure we could do like a 5% roi at the 1ks, im sure i could that easily. |
|
#127
|
|||
|
|||
|
joe,
to clarify, you mean your ROI on the party 530s was 10.7 over 2139. citanul |
|
#128
|
|||
|
|||
|
joe, i don't subscribe to sharkscope either, but they give 5 free searches a day!
|
|
#129
|
|||
|
|||
|
yes, or 14.3% after 1750 (but if you include rakeback it would be 16% [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
|
#130
|
|||
|
|||
|
i know i used the free searches and it gave me my roi and avergae buy in and stuff, but i think its inaccurate
|
![]() |
|
|