Gus and Danny's set over set

[phaesis]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
There's also a thread on the FCP forum where Daniel insists that Gus put him on an overpair throughout the entire hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

link?

[/ QUOTE ]

http://www.fullcontactpoker.com/poke...howtopic=72124

[MCS]

[ QUOTE ]
With all that action – you better have the [censored] nuts."

http://ekstrabladet.dk/poker/article189353.ece

[/ QUOTE ]

The "you better have the [censored] nuts" part is written in English on the Danish website. That's pretty cool, but why?

[darom03]

Well in Denmark we all speak english, and "the nuts" doesn't have a danish word that sounds cool.

[Brocktoon]

Thanks for the link.

Its pretty striking how much DNs comments fly in the face of the Gus article. They basically couldn't be anymore opposite in their take.

DN says that Gus put him on an overpair and not a made hand from start to finish while Gus in the article states that he didn't like his flopped set after the flop action! Clearly someone here is either very, very mistaken or not being completely honest.

I find DN's assertion that Gus checked the river because, "he's more likely to get a value bet from AA than for AA to call a bet on the river" completely baffling. Why the hell would AA bet a 4 straight, paired board on the river in a big pot? The more I look at the 2 sides of this story the more it seems to favor Gus' version.

[Fallen Hero]

DN is insane if he thinks Gus put him on an overpair.