Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-05-2006, 02:22 AM
Wes Mantooth Wes Mantooth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC
Posts: 2,826
Default Re: Lienart, Bush are both better than V Young

[ QUOTE ]
vnh

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-05-2006, 03:32 AM
David David is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: United States
Posts: 773
Default Re: Lienart, Bush are both better than V Young

Say what you want about Vince Young. I've been watching the guy play since he was in high school and the one thing I have always seen is......the guy is a WINNER.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-05-2006, 03:45 AM
bills217 bills217 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: taking DVaut\'s money
Posts: 3,294
Default Re: Lienart, Bush are both better than V Young

[ QUOTE ]
Leinart will be the new Chad Pennington.
Vince Young will be the new Kordell Stewart.

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP

This is a pretty outlandish prediction, but I'm gonna go ahead and say that Jay Cutler (Vanderbilt) will have more success in the NFL than both of them. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-05-2006, 03:49 AM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,859
Default Re: Lienart, Bush are both better than V Young

Not very outlandish, I'm sure plenty of smart people feel that way.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-05-2006, 03:53 AM
behemoth2006 behemoth2006 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,138
Default Re: Lienart, Bush are both better than V Young

[ QUOTE ]
If USC had some defensive people who could tackle it would have been a different story. M. Vick is a better athlete than V Young and the pros can stop him from running.
Basically, the NFL will expose his weakness - he is not a great thrower of the football.
Reggie Bush was the most talented player on the field.
Lienart will be the new Tom Brady.
Vince Young will be the new Aaron Brooks.

[/ QUOTE ]


Aww, didn't someone change their tune??

The only thing better than showing the US how much heart beats inside Texans, is making every single one of you hating bitches who can't admit defeat without sounding like Leinart eat crow.

EAT IT
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-05-2006, 03:55 AM
bills217 bills217 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: taking DVaut\'s money
Posts: 3,294
Default Re: Lienart, Bush are both better than V Young

[ QUOTE ]
Not very outlandish, I'm sure plenty of smart people feel that way.

[/ QUOTE ]

Wow, a semi-agreement! One more than I expected...what a pleasant surprise! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-05-2006, 04:35 AM
Pat Southern Pat Southern is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,601
Default Re: Lienart, Bush are both better than V Young

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
M. Vick is a better athlete than V Young and the pros can stop him from running.

[/ QUOTE ]

O RLY?



Only 6.9/carry. They've got him figured out.

[/ QUOTE ]

2k1 7-9
2k2 9-6-1
2k3 5-11
2k4 11-5
2k5 8-8
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-05-2006, 04:45 AM
Aytumious Aytumious is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,734
Default Re: Lienart, Bush are both better than V Young

[ QUOTE ]

2k1 7-9
2k2 9-6-1
2k3 5-11
2k4 11-5
2k5 8-8

[/ QUOTE ]

As a starting QB, Vick has one of the highest winning percentages of any QB in the league. Last I checked, he was behind only Brady and McNabb.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-05-2006, 04:50 AM
Pat Southern Pat Southern is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,601
Default Re: Lienart, Bush are both better than V Young

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

2k1 7-9
2k2 9-6-1
2k3 5-11
2k4 11-5
2k5 8-8

[/ QUOTE ]

As a starting QB, Vick has one of the highest winning percentages of any QB in the league. Last I checked, he was behind only Brady and McNabb.

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you really think that a team has a good chance of going deep with Vick at QB? A QB who generally only relies on physical ability has little upside and will only go so far as his supporting cast takes him. The NFL is too fast of a league to rely on a QB who has to scramble on every other 3rd and 5.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-05-2006, 04:53 AM
12ozLongneck 12ozLongneck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 200
Default Re: Lienart, Bush are both better than V Young

[ QUOTE ]
If USC had some defensive people who could tackle it would have been a different story.

[/ QUOTE ]

If The Queen had balls, she'd be The King. Whatever makes you feel better.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.