![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
hand is played by a friend of mine, he's 1 of the most winning 2/4 players @ stars- so villain probably knows him; however he doesnt have much info on villain.
There was a previous hand where hero raised button to 12, villain reraised small (30ish), and hero called w/ 78s. Flop A72 c/c, turn 8, sb chks, hero ~pots, villain c/rs, hero pushes villain calls. AK no good for a stack. Villains on about 3 of hero's tables when this hand comes up. villain (925) hero (covers) hero raises to 12 w/ Q [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Q [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], villain reraises to 34 from SB. (70$) 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 2 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] villain pots, hero calls (210$) 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 2 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] t [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] villain checks, hero bets 140, villain calls. (490$) 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 2 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] t [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 9 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] villain checks... HERO?? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
If you bet here is it for value or a bluff?
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
If you bet here is it for value or a bluff? [/ QUOTE ] could be either. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ok this is my hand, i showed it to Durrrr and made him post it b/c he is my bitch. Anyway two things to clear up: the hand is 6max and I raised utg with QQ, and also in the previous hand we played i was OOP and the action went check/check on the flop, turn i lead for 48 he raises to 144 i shove (we both started the hand with 400).
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
If you bet here is it for value or a bluff? [/ QUOTE ] I think this is a clear check. I don't know if I'm ahead or being trapped. When I'm not sure, a check behind seems prudent. I don't see a bet folding KK/AA. I don't see many worse hands calling. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If you bet here is it for value or a bluff? [/ QUOTE ] could be either. [/ QUOTE ] Until we figure out what it is, I'm sure not betting. His range should be like AA-TT or something, right? Barring additional information, betting just looks like a way to boost variance. And possibly -EV. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I agree. I'd rather miss out on a very very small bit of potential value in a big pot than either value bet his better marginal hand for him or give myself a chance to lose the pot by folding the winner. I don't try to bluff people off of AA/KK (it doesn't work) and I don't think you have a +EV vb here.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
wow, it would be such a weird way to play AA/KK for him. and it would take balls to try to checkraise the river if he hit a two-outer on turn/river. i don't know if it's wishful thinking but it really looks like we have him beat and there's a great chance he'd pay off with like JJ. if value were the only thing on our minds here, i think i'd bet, but it sure is slim and the fact that we would absolutely LOVE to see his hole cards here makes it a check in my opinion.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
I didn't see the T on the turn.
And how is this a weird way to play AA/KK? |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
I agree. I understand Thwworstplayer's arguments but man, just really doesn't feel like he'd play AA/KK that way. I think a value bet is +EV, though thin. I'm curious as to the results as I'm a results-oriented fish.
|
![]() |
|
|