Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old 11-24-2007, 06:02 PM
mrick mrick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 159
Default Re: A Critique of Rothbardian Natural Rights (sorta long)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


ANARCHIST : "Property is theft".

Anarcho-CAPITALIST : "Property is sacrosanct".

[/ QUOTE ]

Anarchists cannot say any property ownership is theft without being a hypocrite. They privately use their body and the land they stand on to make such pronouncements.

[/ QUOTE ]
The human body is not property. It is the physical embodiment of self. As such it is not for sale, rent or otherwise, in a just society -- even less so in a society without masters, i.e. anarchy.

As to "the land they stand on", the land belongs to everybody in the anarchic society! In any case, use of the land, such as standing on it, is different from owning it.

Lots of Anarchicts have been hypocrites in their everyday life, and in their application in practical terms of their beliefs. But what you wrote is far from being a refutation of Anarchy.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.