Absolute Poker Scandal: An Inside Job

[Josem]

[ QUOTE ]
Do we have any evidence that user #363 is the only superaccount?

[/ QUOTE ]
It seems to me that this is self-evidently impossible to prove.

After all, there is always the chance that a particular superaccount has never been used before.

[ QUOTE ]
IMO this number is disturbingly large to apply to an account with this sort of power, any idea as to how many other superaccounts could be in use or could have been used in the past?

[/ QUOTE ]

This would be pure speculation. There's no evidence that other accounts have been used - although, if someone has more of the Absolute HHs from other play by the cheaters, that may change.