![]() |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Perpetual growth is infinite growth, and resources are finite. So wouldn't a "problem" with resources depend on the timeline? [/ QUOTE ] Sure. So what do you think the timeline is? The market is signalling, through prices, that recycling is a less efficient way of obtaining these resources. The timeline *does* get factored in - but so does the *present value* of the resources that would be used *now* to recycle. If you want to pay someone extra to process your trash, and be an "early adopter" that's fine with me. I'm not a big fan, however, of the fact that I am charged extra for my city-provided sanitation services so they can recycle my trash whether I want them to or not. [/ QUOTE ] I'll agree with that |
|
|