Re: The Fate of #756 by Marc Ecko
[ QUOTE ]
He knows Bonds used steroids but prefers arguing semantics. Perfect example here.
[/ QUOTE ]
I don't know that Bonds used steroids, and neither do you. There have been allegations, supported by uncorroborated and unsubstantiated evidence, but nothing has been proven.
But what we both know is that he didn't violate the MLB steroid policy, that's an indisputable fact.
Anytime I point out that Bonds hasn't violated the rule, you counter with "bah, semantics! semantics! BAh!" and carry on asserting he cheated, despite not breaking any rule.
|