Party Regs Thread

[Shizzle12345]

at ongame, you leave table, and like 2 hours later you join some tables again, and suddenl your sitting 250BB deep, because thats with how much you left. And 3 other tags have 200BB too. I kinda dont like that.

should be 30 min then. And isnt anyone bothered by the fact that party folds hands for you when you can check if you time out?

[Unknown Soldier]

ok heres the draft. my punctuation probably sucks so tweak away (ill put the finished one in bold):


"Hello, this is E-mail is in regards to a few software changes that I, and many other players in the poker community think will improve the players experience at Party Poker.

Firstly, I would like to suggest that you correct the blinds when the game is one-on-one. In the rules of the game, the small blind is supposed to be the button, however on Party Poker the big blind is on the button. I would also like to recommend that you create one-on-one cash tables. Just like the tables that PokerStars and Full Tilt Poker have at the moment.

My second request is in regards to the introduction of a time bank. A lot of players and I agree that some decisions need longer then 15 seconds to make.

Finally I would greatly appreciate it if you increase the minimum amount that a player is allowed to buy-in for. At the moment it is only 20 big blinds. I feel like that is far too little. It encourages players to buy-in for 20 big-blinds then go all-in or fold every hand. This makes playing in a game with them an un-pleasurable experience. I and others feel that 40 big-blinds should be the new minimum buy-in.

I really enjoy playing at Party Poker, and hope that you will take into account these potential changes in order to make your site an even better playing environment for everyone. Thank you."

[Michaelson]

[ QUOTE ]
yeah got HU cash tables.

Michaelson, i have a problem with that. I sometimes (and im sure you do to) like to change seats in order to have position on a fish. Plus increasing the minimum buy-in will deiscourage ratholers (who are usually shortstackers anyway) thoughts?

[/ QUOTE ]

I honestly don't have much of a problem with short stackers provided the money they win stays on the table as long as they do. Also, there's no reason you can't change set to get position on a fish, you just can't take money off the table, so when you sit back down one of those annoying party popups would come up saying "because you left blah blah blah"

[traz]

timebank would be great. Also, the automuck when you run out of time is VERY LAME.

But funny story from this wknd...guy raises, I 3bet with QQ, he calls. Flop comes all unders...I'm busy posting on 2p2 and I miss the timer, so it open mucks my hand. I start screaming like WTF...but then villain shows AA and goes WTF HOW COULD YOU JUST FOLD? And I reply "sick read"

[traz]

also, the option to switch seats when there is an open seat would be very nice imo

[capodu]

[ QUOTE ]
...but then villain shows AA and goes WTF HOW COULD YOU JUST FOLD? And I reply "sick read"

[/ QUOTE ]

god works in weird ways [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

[capodu]

[ QUOTE ]
ok heres the draft. my punctuation probably sucks so tweak away (ill put the finished one in bold):


"Hello, this is E-mail is in regards to a few software changes that I, and many other players in the poker community think will improve the players experience at Party Poker.

Firstly, I would like to suggest that you correct the blinds when the game is one-on-one. In the rules of the game, the small blind is supposed to be the button, however on Party Poker the big blind is on the button. I would also like to recommend that you create one-on-one cash tables. Just like the tables that PokerStars and Full Tilt Poker have at the moment.

My second request is in regards to the introduction of a time bank. A lot of players and I agree that some decisions need longer then 15 seconds to make.

Finally I would greatly appreciate it if you increase the minimum amount that a player is allowed to buy-in for. At the moment it is only 20 big blinds. I feel like that is far too little. It encourages players to buy-in for 20 big-blinds then go all-in or fold every hand. This makes playing in a game with them an un-pleasurable experience. I and others feel that 40 big-blinds should be the new minimum buy-in.

I really enjoy playing at Party Poker, and hope that you will take into account these potential changes in order to make your site an even better playing environment for everyone. Thank you."

[/ QUOTE ]

im drunk and lazy so if nothing happens ill fix it up tomorrow.

Im joining all the short tables and destroying people HU and 3 man its fun! Oh damn it would be sweet if they got some HU tables

[SpecT]

[ QUOTE ]
also, the option to switch seats when there is an open seat would be very nice imo

[/ QUOTE ]

omg yes, i hate having to sitout, close the table, wait til i leave the table, rejoin the table, then try and get the other seat coz its always [censored] taken by then

[BombayBadboy]

[ QUOTE ]
also, the option to switch seats when there is an open seat would be very nice imo

[/ QUOTE ]

This will never happen..

Also, what do you guys think about the russian shortstackers that invest the games lately? Bots? I see some of them literally everytime I play.

[AaronOC]

why is there no standard tables running now? all i see is no dp tables???