|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: BBV | |||
| This is clearly B, B, or V |
   
|
4 | 6.35% |
| double you tea eff mate? |
  
|
8 | 12.70% |
| TGIF Mate! |
  
|
6 | 9.52% |
| BBV gets worse every day |
  
|
14 | 22.22% |
| BBV gets better every day |
  
|
10 | 15.87% |
| BBV got so bad it was good but now the downward spiral is like looking like Snakes on a Plane 2 starring Heratio Sanz (no samuel L= beat zomg) |
  
|
11 | 17.46% |
| Danza, ysscky |
|
10 | 15.87% |
| Voters: 63. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#8
08-10-2007, 02:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ozzy87 busted for speeding
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] > consenting to the chemical test was fatal. At least for this, I doubt he had a choice after the weed was found in the car. In many states, it's handled the same way as alcohol: if you are suspected of drinking and driving (i.e., under the influence), you are obligated to take a breathalyzer (you can refuse, but guilt is assumed by law when you do this). [/ QUOTE ] Many states have a rule that evidence that a defendnat refused to take a chemical test may be used by a jury to infer that the reason why he refused that test was that he was intoxicated. However, the case is a lot weaker without a chemical test when its presented to a jury. Especially when it is DUI drugs you're charged with (as opposed to alcohol), when the prosecution has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you were under the influence of a particular drug, but has no chemical test to pinpoint which one. [/ QUOTE ] any good lawyer will tell you to refuse any test and take your chances in court [/ QUOTE ] So let me see, you have two choices 1. take the test and be guilty 100% of the time, or 2. Anything is better then #1 
|
|
|
Threaded Mode