Ozzy87 busted for speeding

[thiamide]

> consenting to the chemical test was fatal.

At least for this, I doubt he had a choice after the weed was found in the car. In many states, it's handled the same way as alcohol: if you are suspected of drinking and driving (i.e., under the influence), you are obligated to take a breathalyzer (you can refuse, but guilt is assumed by law when you do this).

[N 82 50 24]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
First, LOL @ "2007 BMW G-6 sportscar". [censored]

[/ QUOTE ]
if youre driving(regularly speeding) this with pot in it, how do you not have a spot for your pot hidden behind the instrument panels or wherever?

[/ QUOTE ]
He doesn't drive with weed regularly.

[ShipIt77]

i assume they mean bmw 6 series? there is no g6

[jman220]

Wow, he's actually lucky this didn't go badly, from what I gather he is:

1. Driving like an absolute [censored] maniac.
2. Someone who looks like they might be Arab/Muslim
3. With a Middle-Eastern Sounding Name.
4. Carrying a Fake Pakistani ID
5. Carrying over $50,000 in cash with him.
6. With drugs in his car.
7. Telling a story to the cops that makes no sense (from the cops point of view).
8. Post 9-11

[N 82 50 24]

[ QUOTE ]
i assume they mean bmw 6 series? there is no g6

[/ QUOTE ]
M6... this car.

[fusting1234]

[ QUOTE ]
So wait, i think i am not understanding something completly clearly.

If you are pulled over and they drug test you for weed, and you test positive, even if it was like 2 weeks ago, you get a DUI?

That seems a bit odd to me

[/ QUOTE ]

[Ansky]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
this guy sounds like a piece of [censored]

[/ QUOTE ]

are u kidding? ozzy is the man

[/ QUOTE ]

dunno if you heard but HE BROKE THE LAW BRO.

[jman220]

[ QUOTE ]
> consenting to the chemical test was fatal.

At least for this, I doubt he had a choice after the weed was found in the car. In many states, it's handled the same way as alcohol: if you are suspected of drinking and driving (i.e., under the influence), you are obligated to take a breathalyzer (you can refuse, but guilt is assumed by law when you do this).

[/ QUOTE ]

Many states have a rule that evidence that a defendnat refused to take a chemical test may be used by a jury to infer that the reason why he refused that test was that he was intoxicated. However, the case is a lot weaker without a chemical test when its presented to a jury. Especially when it is DUI drugs you're charged with (as opposed to alcohol), when the prosecution has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you were under the influence of a particular drug, but has no chemical test to pinpoint which one.

[jman220]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
So wait, i think i am not understanding something completly clearly.

If you are pulled over and they drug test you for weed, and you test positive, even if it was like 2 weeks ago, you get a DUI?

That seems a bit odd to me

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

No, but the presence of weed in your system coupled with the fact that you were driving recklessly, failing to maintain your lane, swerving all over the road (and maybe you failed field sobriety tests or smelled like weed, the article could be incomplete) supports a charge of DUI.

[dibbs]

Good to know you can kill poker and still be a [censored] idiot.

Such a sick car though.