![]() |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
@Aaron
You know what i mean. When the concept of value betting has been developed there were no Micro-Stakes, and no Theory about Small-Stakes Holdem. Adjustments have been made to MS and SS. Why its important i stated in some posts before. Because of simplified VB-concepts for lower stakes, ignoring and not discussing exceptions and dynamic changes in conditions. Conditions changes in the course of time. For example if playing-styles changes playing concepts change their values. Example: If you play against players who have "learned" to checkraise the best hand on the river (it doesnīt matter here if its good or bad play) and you value bet your weaker hand on the river, you are the guy paying off in the long-run due to the raise. So the players who learned to checkraise on the river make your "learned" play of value-betting not profitable. But you learned that value-betting is profitable and you donīt realize that you lose by your play against the checkraisers. ----- Donīt ask me to explain Pot-Equity. I think you know exactly what i mean and if i should err read some books again. By the way: Pot Equity is the only tool you have to figure out a bet or a raise. Nothing else you explained when you talk about your heads-up decision. I dont understand really your multiway decision process but you have a clear bet if you have enough pot-equity to figure out a bet. I cap it here. I have no gains from further discussion of basics. |
|
|