![]() |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
If you want to talk seriously about poker cool down and stop any kind of aggressions in your postings. I know exactly what you mean, i know the standard play and i need not any advice.
Calling a bet here with any pair, two pair or trips is really weak. In this spot you are only about 5% to catch a bluff. Not enough to call multiway. OK there are a lot of weak players out calling this. I know it and i like it. The nice thing is, there are a lot of players out there in these limits betting into your flush too. Weak play. My stats say about 7% of the 5+ply river-hands are checked through here. In 1/2 to .25/.50 and 5+ players still in, it happens f.i. frequently that i`m sitting with a flush there and a east-european or scandinavian fires out after 2 player checked with a straight, trips or even two pairs. Thats why i thought why not checking here with a flush first to bet? And i have good results with this play. There are rare situations with hands higher than pair checking through behind me in this limit without tight players. The value i lose here is outweighted by the surprise action i get after my check, when one of the last 2 players to act bets. I would still bet here with a nut flush. Here i get my extra money from weak players who raise with a slightly weaker flush on the river and from value-betting the turn. If you are not first to bet here, than its wright to bet for value. Also if they ALL are passive and the river is often checked i would auto-bet it out here. ---- and: "if you find that people are auto-folding to your bets whenever a potential draw hits and thus making them have no value- heres some news for you - you arent betting enough." Here are some news for you. People in these limits donīt care much about betting patterns. And it doesnīt matter much if you bet "enough" or not. A bet in this spot alerts a flush for sure. Anyone who wants to call here knows he has to deal with a sure flush. If anyone is betting "enough" by bluff betting here s/he lose money. |
|
|