![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Would you rather be broke as a joke or a filthy rich overweight AxisOfEvilian? | |||
| Broke as a Joke |
|
13 | 24.53% |
| Filthy rich overweight AxisOfEvilian |
|
40 | 75.47% |
| Voters: 53. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#4011
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think that's probably the key for me too
|
|
#4012
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I think that's probably the key for me too [/ QUOTE ] I had the same problem and still have sometimes but since ive been focusing on that (and other things too but mostly on that), my winrate has been increasing. edit kk vs aa sux |
|
#4013
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
you dont have to win more pot to increase winrate, you have to lose less [/ QUOTE ] This is such a powerful statement. People get so focused on extracting better with big hands that often they forget(I'm 100% guilty of this) that they need to work on minimizing losses with second best hands. |
|
#4014
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I'm looking at the hands I showed down and lost, and I played like 95% of them SO badly. I don't know wtf I'm thinking sometimes, its really terrible. [/ QUOTE ] Amen. You just found TEH secret. [/ QUOTE ] If I figure out how to not play like a drooling idiot I think I can beat 25nl for a little better than 3ptbb/100 like I have been this month. I mean, I'm embarrassed to post these hands, they're awful. [/ QUOTE ] most of players : you dont have to win more pot to increase winrate, you have to lose less [/ QUOTE ] so less suckouts=more profit????? [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
|
#4015
|
|||
|
|||
|
I also think I pay far more attention to your posts now that Scarlett's there.
|
|
#4016
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] you dont have to win more pot to increase winrate, you have to lose less [/ QUOTE ] This is such a powerful statement. People get so focused on extracting better with big hands that often they forget(I'm 100% guilty of this) that they need to work on minimizing losses with second best hands. [/ QUOTE ] I been preaching pot control for about 3-4 months now, but the congregation is still sinning! |
|
#4017
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] you dont have to win more pot to increase winrate, you have to lose less [/ QUOTE ] This is such a powerful statement. People get so focused on extracting better with big hands that often they forget(I'm 100% guilty of this) that they need to work on minimizing losses with second best hands. [/ QUOTE ] I been preaching pot control for about 3-4 months now, but the congregation is still sinning! [/ QUOTE ] its not pot controt per se [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
|
#4018
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] you dont have to win more pot to increase winrate, you have to lose less [/ QUOTE ] This is such a powerful statement. People get so focused on extracting better with big hands that often they forget(I'm 100% guilty of this) that they need to work on minimizing losses with second best hands. [/ QUOTE ] I been preaching pot control for about 3-4 months now, but the congregation is still sinning! [/ QUOTE ] its not pot controt per se [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] minimizing losses with 2nd best hand=pot control |
|
#4019
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] you dont have to win more pot to increase winrate, you have to lose less [/ QUOTE ] This is such a powerful statement. People get so focused on extracting better with big hands that often they forget(I'm 100% guilty of this) that they need to work on minimizing losses with second best hands. [/ QUOTE ] I been preaching pot control for about 3-4 months now, but the congregation is still sinning! [/ QUOTE ] its not pot controt per se [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] minimizing losses with 2nd best hand=pot control [/ QUOTE ] my comment was way larger than theoric pot control [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
|
#4020
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] you dont have to win more pot to increase winrate, you have to lose less [/ QUOTE ] This is such a powerful statement. People get so focused on extracting better with big hands that often they forget(I'm 100% guilty of this) that they need to work on minimizing losses with second best hands. [/ QUOTE ] I been preaching pot control for about 3-4 months now, but the congregation is still sinning! [/ QUOTE ] its not pot controt per se [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] minimizing losses with 2nd best hand=pot control [/ QUOTE ] my comment was way larger than theoric pot control [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] I hope we're not talking heroic laydowns, b/c those are gay and -ev |
![]() |
|
|