![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Anyone involved in the lending business should take note here. This is a classic example of somehow who has no intention of paying their debts. They will block, distort, and delete all reasonable arguments, and continue to rationalize their poor behavior to themselves and anyone stupid enough to listen. When I see this type, and hear the first ridiculous argument, I immediately know they have no intention to pay despite what they say. If the money is to be returned, it won't be voluntarily. [/ QUOTE ] i dont understand the pt. Newhouse has zero recourse. SHe says he let her use the acct. He admits he did, but not at the stakes she allegedly played. He stayed friendly with her for weeks after. Then he gets all pissy cause she doesnt put out. She now offered to pay him 8k to drop the whole thing. This is 8k more than any court would award him. And he says he will take the money but not absolve the debt. So if you were her, you would pay here? for realz? [/ QUOTE ] You misunderstand my point. I did not mean to comment on whether or not Brandi should pay him back, as I do not know all the details. Nor did I bring up legal recourse, as again I don't have the details (i.e. offer? acceptance? consideration?) I simply meant, people who are owed money can learn from this typical reaction. As soon as I hear excuses about personal responsibility, I know the money will not be freely offered. Maybe that isnt the case here, but I'd wager that Newhouse won't be satisfied with the result in terms of dollar amount. That's all I was saying, maybe it is common sense but I've repeatedly seen people wasting a lot of time and energy trying to collect and end up just getting in stupid arguments that go nowhere. |
|
|