![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
For your entertainment. Two Rooks Home Casino [/ QUOTE ] Too obvious. Hope you get suspened per the updated sticky. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] For your entertainment. Two Rooks Home Casino [/ QUOTE ] Too obvious. Hope you get suspened per the updated sticky. [/ QUOTE ] Ehh... I like it. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
The rake in live high stakes games in pretty small as a percentage of the pot. In the biggest games in the US, they may be paying like $30/hour time charge.
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
POTY
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
You know how far the Bellagio sports book and the craps table is from Chip's house?? come on now.
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
why play low stakes at a casino? empty seats need filling [/ QUOTE ] Not to mentoin that the rake affects the lower stakes a lot more than the higher stakes. |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wasn't there some Swedish pro (Martin somebody?) who hired a cheat (Russ G?) to rig a hotel room with cameras? The idea was he would get his buddies out of casino to play in his room. The scheme didn't work because they wouldn't leave the casino.
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
When Brunson et al were trading public letters with Andy Beal to negotiate more heads-up limit play, one of the points that the pros insisted on was that the games be played in a licensed casino.
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think a better question might be why would anyone take the risk of playing a high-stakes game in a private-home when there's a much safer option in the form of a casino available for a pretty low fee (low compard to the stakes they are playing for at least)
|
![]() |
|
|