![]() |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I don't understand how you're not saying democracy can work. [/ QUOTE ] Depends on what you mean by "work." [ QUOTE ] You're voting for a guy because he achieves some of your goals through the system of taxation and the use of force. [/ QUOTE ] No, I'm voting for a guy because he's going to hurt me a lot less than the other guy. My vote is purely self-defense. [ QUOTE ] Thats exactly what every statist is doing you may have different goals but the principle is the same. [/ QUOTE ] No, statists vote to force their beliefs on others, not out of self-defense. [ QUOTE ] You're saying I support a man who supports taxation. How is that not a support for taxation? [/ QUOTE ] I support you in your AC beliefs. Does that mean I support and agree with everything you say? Obviously not. [ QUOTE ] I have the chance to convince people that aggression is wrong in all it's forms [/ QUOTE ] You do? How are you convincing people of this? Internet discussions where you, along with the combined efforts of several others might convince a dozen or so people over the course of your lifetime? LOL [ QUOTE ] Ron Paul can never do that because he's advocated aggression. [/ QUOTE ] Absolutely false. He can set people on the right path from which they will be in a position to draw the proper conclusions. [ QUOTE ] Who's got a better chance at changing the world for the better? [/ QUOTE ] Ron Paul, and it's not even remotely close. Even if you assume your idea of you converting more to non-violence is true, it's still Ron Paul because "for the better" isn't "perfect." |
|
|