Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Full Ring
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-05-2007, 04:57 PM
Roger Mainfield Roger Mainfield is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Thailand
Posts: 657
Default NL 100 AKs

No read on opponent, other than he is a bit short and probably not that great.

I am dealt AKcc in the co.
Effective stacks are 75$


My opponenent (1 to my right) raises to 3, I reraise to 8$ folds back to him and he calls.

<font color="blue"> Everyone was folding to my 3 bets so I lowered the size, this is the most major mistake in the hand I believe.</font>

Flop 5 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 4 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] A [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Pot: 17$
Check call a 7$ bet
<font color="blue"> My thinking here is that the pot is gonna get big compared to his stack, I likely have the best hand and he is probably drawing mighty slim.</font>

Turn 2 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Pot: 31$

He bets 15$ I call

<font color="blue"> I am underreping my hand and still confident I am ahead, if I raise he wil prob shut down unless it is a chop, so I give him some more rope.</font>

River 6 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] Pot: 61$
He bets 30$, I raise him all in (like 20 more)

<font color="blue"> He is commited with anything he raises with to call I think, and I am still confident I have the best hand so I get it in.</font>

I rarely slowplay, but based on this board I felt that this was one of the time, like it?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-05-2007, 05:09 PM
mack848 mack848 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,300
Default Re: NL 100 AKs

I like it.

Rather than lower my 3bet, I prefer to widen my 3bet range.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-05-2007, 06:01 PM
spector spector is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 320
Default Re: NL 100 AKs

Seems like a pretty good line to me and one I would take on occasion. Not sure on the river though, do you think he has air here on the river or possibly a weaker ace?

Did he flip 55 or something?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-05-2007, 06:07 PM
DougieG DougieG is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 701
Default Re: NL 100 AKs

[ QUOTE ]
Rather than lower my 3bet, I prefer to widen my 3bet range.

[/ QUOTE ]

A+
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-05-2007, 07:51 PM
Roger Mainfield Roger Mainfield is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Thailand
Posts: 657
Default Re: NL 100 AKs

Again't a CO or something similar raise I will re-raise a lot of stuff 67s-9Ts KQs as well as normal premium hands and when deep all pp's. I hadn't really though about just raising more stuff and shutting out peoples implied odds. I will think about it some more, A though on that I play at mansion and so no PT. I will have to have a pretty good read before I make it light, cause it seems like people are very tight with raises pre.

I think my opponent could have qq-kk rarely there, aj-aq sometimes and a chop a good percentage of the time as well.

He had 33 for the straight if anyone is interested.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-05-2007, 08:11 PM
bottomset bottomset is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: middleset ftw
Posts: 12,983
Default Re: NL 100 AKs

I think the turn is a fold

river fold&gt;call&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;push
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-05-2007, 08:18 PM
Roger Mainfield Roger Mainfield is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Thailand
Posts: 657
Default Re: NL 100 AKs

getting 3-1?? I think we see AQ and AK here very often, and sometimes an aggro JJ-KK.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-05-2007, 08:59 PM
bottomset bottomset is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: middleset ftw
Posts: 12,983
Default Re: NL 100 AKs

[ QUOTE ]
getting 3-1?? I think we see AQ and AK here very often, and sometimes an aggro JJ-KK.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think fold and call are close on the river

I think pushing is really bad
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-06-2007, 12:56 AM
RipperTEQ RipperTEQ is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 92
Default Re: NL 100 AKs

3 bet 72off and show, that will get you some action. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

I like the river call over push.

Think about it this way...you can put in $30 to win $91 or you put in $50 to win $111. How often would he need to bet a worse hand to make pushing &gt; calling?

x($111) + (1-x)(-$50) &gt; x($91) + (1-x)(-$30)
111x + 50x - 50 &gt; 91x + 30x - 30
161x - 50 &gt; 121x - 30
40x &gt; 20
x &gt; .50

If 50% of the time you are ahead, then you get the following EVs for each:

EVcall = .50($91) + .50(-$30) = $45.50 - $15 = +$30.50
EVpush = .50($111) + .50(-$50) = $55.50 - $25 = +$30.50

So without a clear read as an opponent being aggressive, this is a call not a push because not many opponents will bet marginal hands on the river, except in the low limits. Even then, you will lose money in the long run without a read.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-06-2007, 02:25 AM
Roger Mainfield Roger Mainfield is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Thailand
Posts: 657
Default Re: NL 100 AKs

So he needs to call at least 50% of the time on the river with a worse hand for a push to be correct? (self-obvious)

Anyway back to the turn, you really think this is a fold? Someone bets 1/2 pot into you on 2 streets and you fold TPTK?(specially since we underepped our hand) I really think we see worse aces, or AK here a lot of the time.

Here is my thinking on possible hands by the river:
22-55, these hands all have either a straight or a set. They are quite possible but pf makes them iffy.

99-KK, very opponent dependant, aggro opponent might try betting them both streets, but would usually check the river.

AJ-AK, Very possible, hands trying to get value the whole way with value bets on all streets.

Note: I didn't even include air here, as I would have noticed if Villian had done crazy stuff prior to this (I hope)
This was my thinking in general, I just felt that top pair type hands were the most likely hands(60-70%). And if we narrow it down to the river, The river will be bet by sets and straights all the time, and by AJ-AK most of the time. I don't really do hand distribution math, but basically

IF# of combination of 22-66) &lt; (river bet frequency)(# of combination of (AK(most likely)+AQ(fairly likely)+AJ(rarely))

So if the above statement is true I shove, if its false I call(or fold if it is really small (less than 30:81).
Note: I assume that all hands that bet call a shove (20 into 111)

I haven't plugged numbers in, and I would like to say that after looking at hundreds of posts on 2p2 i've never done this much math/logic.

This post came off pretty snoty reading it over, but I'm no good with grammar. I would appreciate some thoughts on this, I don't usually go into this much detail.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.