|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Mark Seif as a POKER COMMENTATOR: 1-to-10 scale | |||
| 1 |
   
|
30 | 21.58% |
| 2 |
  
|
17 | 12.23% |
| 3 |
  
|
28 | 20.14% |
| 4 |
  
|
19 | 13.67% |
| 5 |
  
|
16 | 11.51% |
| 6 |
  
|
8 | 5.76% |
| 7 |
|
9 | 6.47% |
| 8 |
|
5 | 3.60% |
| 9 |
|
1 | 0.72% |
| 10 |
|
6 | 4.32% |
| Voters: 139. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#9
05-05-2007, 07:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A few \'scientific\' polls to compare OOT to the rest of the US
[ QUOTE ]
ID and evolution arent mutually exclusive is my point. It really is a nice try, you know, getting his wording to pander to the "intelligent" posters on this board, but anyone with half a brain can see how ridiculously leading and condescending the questions are. [/ QUOTE ] I agree that his language isn't precise, and probably a little more loaded/biased than helpful. Not being religious myself I didn't have a problem picking the choices, but you're right that not all of the choices are mutually exclusive. I think a more interesting way to word the evolution/ID question would have been either: Which of the following is a scientific theory: 1) Natural Selection 2) Intelligent Design 3) Both 4) Neither or something like that, though that just measures knowledge and not so much personal "belief" I guess 
|
|
|
Threaded Mode