Post deleted by Mat Sklansky

[durron597]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Will anypne who has played both Stars and Party agree that Star's $60's are comparable to Party's $109's and the $27's to the $55's?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think that's true at all

[/ QUOTE ]

I do

[bigballz]

just keep bumping it

[suzzer99]

Eh, it's not like we get that many $100s posts. Think of it as AAA for the big boys.

[curtains]

I think splitting the forum is not a great idea.

[The Yugoslavian]

[ QUOTE ]
Alright thanks, I have not played party past the $22's since I moved to Stars, but this is what I have been told. Confirmed wrong!

[/ QUOTE ]

Are we talking turbos vs. speed? Actually I have no idea anymore b/c I've played so few speed tournies on party. I also have played no non turbo Stars STTs...so unless you're talking about just turbo vs. old party STTs whatever I think is completely useless rather than 90% useless, [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img].

FWIW Lori agrees with you and Durron but isn't happy about it, [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img].

Yugoslav

[suzzer99]

[ QUOTE ]
bigballz,

No.

Wtf are you getting that idea?

Yugoslav

[/ QUOTE ]

I know a decent amount of people who have said the PP $55s are way softer than the PS $60s. (ok 2 or 3) Never heard anyone who has played both say they are comparable. Now whether the $60s are comparable to the $109s, haven't heard much on that.

And is any of this at all relevant to the proposed board split? No.

[The Yugoslavian]

[ QUOTE ]

I think splitting the forum is not a great idea.

[/ QUOTE ]

*nod*

Us world champs will lose all of our fanboys.

Yugoslav

[Paul B.]

[ QUOTE ]
Will anypne who has played both Stars and Party agree that Star's $60's are comparable to Party's $109's and the $27's to the $55's?

[/ QUOTE ]

Stars 60's are a LOT easier than Party 109s.