![]() |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
AlexM made the assertion that 50% left after 20 years implies 25% left after 40 years [/ QUOTE ] He used those numbers with the caveat that he didn't mean exactly those. If he simply said that the number would be significantly smaller then 50% in 40 years as opposed to 20 he would be undeniably correct. [ QUOTE ] It could just as easily still be 50% or 40% or (maybe not quite as easily)even 60%. [/ QUOTE ] With the possible exception of 40%, no, no it couldn't. |
|
|