Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Beginners Questions
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #27  
Old 03-20-2007, 08:11 PM
Joey Joe Joe Joey Joe Joe is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 46
Default Re: Interesting take on poker pros

[ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
Really, what is more likely, that Phil Ivey has been 3 standard deviations to the lucky side of the curve, or 3 standard deviations to the unlucky side?

[/ QUOTE ]

It's EQUALLY likely he's at either, because the amount of luck over that period of time is so small that it doesn't matter. The small factor of luck is nothing compared to the level of skill.

Where Ivey falls on the luck curve doesn't matter, because over time the amount of luck involved is just way too small to matter.

[/ QUOTE ]

You say my argument is sad, and then you say the above? To argue that Phil Ivey is just as likely to have been very unlucky as very lucky is ridiculous. Saying that the amount of luck involved is way too small to matter is just beyond belief.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.