Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Gambling > Probability
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-13-2006, 02:43 PM
MagicFlea MagicFlea is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 137
Default Advanced Probability (math or stat majors probably only need apply)

I want help on my homework [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

I need to show a certain probability converges >0 as the limit goes to inf.

Pn(i,i)= (1-e^-(n^c)) for arbitrary small constant c

Need to show: PI (n=1 to inf) (Pn(i,i)) > 0

I've simplified it to showing (1-e^-(n^c))^n does not dissapear as n->inf which should be provable with the binomial expansion but its not working for me. If you have an idea on either front I'd be happy [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

(this relates to cooling schedules for annealating processes, if it interests you)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-13-2006, 11:33 PM
AaronBrown AaronBrown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 2,260
Default Re: Advanced Probability (math or stat majors probably only need apply)

There's something wrong with the problem, or perhaps in trying to type it in text. Can you type it in LaTex?

I assume Pn is supposed to be P-subscript-n; but what are the arguments (i,i)? They don't appear in the expression. By PI I assume you mean product. But what goes to infinity? Do you mean the limit of the sequence of products from n=1 to m as m goes to infinity?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-14-2006, 05:07 AM
Siegmund Siegmund is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,850
Default Re: Advanced Probability (math or stat majors probably only need apply

I'm sure you know we can't give you a proof, just point you in a direction that might be fruitful......

the product of the P_i is zero iff the sum of the logs of the P_i goes to -infinity.

Can you say anything about this sum?

There are some handy bounds above and below on the value of log(1+x) for sufficiently small x.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-15-2006, 01:25 PM
SunOfBeach SunOfBeach is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Minimax Consulting
Posts: 466
Default Re: Advanced Probability (math or stat majors probably only need apply)

I'm having a bit of a problem with your notation/description. Could you rewrite this for me, and/or pm me? i'd be happy to help you through it...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-16-2006, 04:20 PM
BillC BillC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 115
Default Re: Advanced Probability (math or stat majors probably only need apply

I agree with the others that you should be more clear (I would take points off for sloppiness). I presume 0<c<1.

It is unethical to get 2+2'ers to do your HW for you...Otoh, you can't believe everthing you read here, so I'll give a hint: Fall off a log and go to the hospital.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.