|
|
#31
02-21-2007, 02:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The math is easy(-ish) on this one.
you do realize that isn't my quote.
|
|
#32
02-21-2007, 02:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The math is easy(-ish) on this one.
i was just "quick replying" to that quote
|
|
#34
02-21-2007, 03:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The math is easy(-ish) on this one.
[ QUOTE ]
unless villain is an idiot i doubt we are ahead even 35%. if i was him i wouldnt cap kq. [/ QUOTE ] Villain being a mediocre player was specified in the original post. (Does that mean we have to allow for 77, not just 55)? Suppose he caps with AQ, 55 100%, and he caps with QJ, QT, Q9, Q8s just 33% of the time -- there's 3 ways for him to have AQ, 3 ways for 55, and 4 ways for QJ, 4 for QT, 4 for Q9, 1 for Q8s. Bleah -- that is 6 caps with something beating us vs 4.33 caps with something we're beating. So we're only ahead around 45% . . . okay, maybe I think we should check/call now [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].
|
|
#37
02-25-2007, 03:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The math is easy(-ish) on this one.
c/r river
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
