![]() |
|
#791
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yeah I do that as well, but it is a pain in the ass. Especially since all my anti-virus software and other stuff has seemingly random letters naming the processes.
|
|
#792
|
|||
|
|||
|
I want to play shorthanded STTs where the payouts are 65/35. Pokerstars and Full Tilt Poker has these. But there are so many players at the low buy-ins on these sites that the 1-3 other sharks at the table are usually sharks you havenīt played with before or only a few times, and I think it is more fun to play when these sharks are people you have met numeral times and know well. Whether I know them or not does not affect ROI, but it is just more fun to play with people you know.
So I would like to know if there are other sites with 65/35-payout STTs where the traffic is smaller so I can have more fun playing. The reason why I donīt want other payout-structures is that when I get better I must go to Pokerstars to find decent traffic at higher buy-ins and I donīt want to be used to other payout-structures when doing the move. |
|
#793
|
|||
|
|||
|
I no longer fall for Lee Jones's traps.
PokerStars Game #8459064325: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00) - 2007/02/15 - 19:24:11 (ET) Table 'China' 6-max Seat #6 is the button Seat 1: NoReason2 ($94.35 in chips) Seat 2: GeoStorm2005 ($23.85 in chips) Seat 3: CommanderG ($111.90 in chips) Seat 4: iamfatdave ($22.65 in chips) Seat 5: denne ($54.60 in chips) Seat 6: bosoxfan55 ($118.40 in chips) NoReason2: posts small blind $0.50 GeoStorm2005: posts big blind $1 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to bosoxfan55 [3h 3c] CommanderG: calls $1 iamfatdave: calls $1 denne: calls $1 bosoxfan55: calls $1 NoReason2: calls $0.50 GeoStorm2005: checks *** FLOP *** [7h 3d 9c] NoReason2: checks GeoStorm2005: checks CommanderG: checks iamfatdave: checks denne: checks bosoxfan55: bets $5 NoReason2: folds GeoStorm2005: raises $17.85 to $22.85 and is all-in CommanderG: calls $22.85 iamfatdave: folds denne: folds bosoxfan55: calls $17.85 *** TURN *** [7h 3d 9c] [Qd] CommanderG: bets $39 bosoxfan55: folds *** RIVER *** [7h 3d 9c Qd] [8h] *** SHOW DOWN *** GeoStorm2005: shows [Td 9h] (a pair of Nines) CommanderG: shows [7c 7s] (three of a kind, Sevens) CommanderG collected $71.55 from pot *** SUMMARY *** Total pot $74.55 | Rake $3 Board [7h 3d 9c Qd 8h] Seat 1: NoReason2 (small blind) folded on the Flop Seat 2: GeoStorm2005 (big blind) showed [Td 9h] and lost with a pair of Nines Seat 3: CommanderG showed [7c 7s] and won ($71.55) with three of a kind, Sevens Seat 4: iamfatdave folded on the Flop Seat 5: denne folded on the Flop Seat 6: bosoxfan55 (button) folded on the Turn |
|
#794
|
|||
|
|||
|
GKA,
I hope that was a misclick because that's awful. |
|
#795
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
GKA, I hope that was a misclick because that's awful. [/ QUOTE ] |
|
#796
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
GKA, I hope that was a misclick because that's awful. [/ QUOTE ] ya i shouldnt have overcalled the flop. |
|
#797
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] GKA, I hope that was a misclick because that's awful. [/ QUOTE ] ya i shouldnt have overcalled the flop. [/ QUOTE ] Plz explain reads and stuff/go on aim |
|
#798
|
|||
|
|||
|
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...0&fpart=all
[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]Cit demolishing the thread |
|
#799
|
|||
|
|||
|
Velocity,
Why do I use "audit" in my post in that thread?!? I had to reread the sentence like 10 times for it to make sense. WTF? Yugoslav |
|
#800
|
|||
|
|||
|
why is yugo the last person to have replied to this thread EVERY time i check it? its like a magical power. even if it wasnt yugo, it says yugo. [censored]!
|
![]() |
|
|