![]() |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yea, like I said, I took it very early in the day at 13.
|
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
I had Princeton +13.5
|
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
Guess everyone won but me, oh well.
|
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, if you told me Penn would miss 40% of their FTs, score 21 in the second half, hit one 3 all game [right at the open] and score <50 points, I'dve marked this as an outright loss on my bridgejumper.
However, Princeton is every bit as bad as indicated, even with Penn missing at *least* 7 open layups and putbacks, and purely throwing the ball away on 4-5 fastbreaks and entry passes, Penn not only wins but covers 48-35 for a solid 83 point total, under covering by 29! Princeton now 5-11 ats with totals this low and Under 10 of 16 similarly. Sweated it out, but 3 units won ats, 1 unit on ML. 5-5 on year cbb for profits of 5.1 units including last nite's wins on Santa Clara. |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
As always, thanks for the play. -12.5 and the under were golden.
|
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Hey, you're supposed to bet the line down for me! Harvard did lose in OT at Princeton, but still. [/ QUOTE ] the only reason i say i would play princeton is bc of what you just said. Something very fishy is going on IMO [/ QUOTE ] BTW, your reply made no sense and smacked of noob logic. I say Penn -12 is a good bet and you think it is a 'trap' game by the books in Princeton's favor? LOL_trapaments. |
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
Najdorf- Thanks for the play. I appreciate you posting it in the forum.
|
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
Biff wants his almanac back.
|
![]() |
|
|