![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Greatest Center Fielder | |||
| Ty Cobb |
|
26 | 13.61% |
| Joe Dimaggio |
|
14 | 7.33% |
| Mickey Mantle |
|
30 | 15.71% |
| Willie Mays |
|
119 | 62.30% |
| Tris Speaker |
|
1 | 0.52% |
| Somebody Else |
|
1 | 0.52% |
| Voters: 191. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#461
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If you are actually looking for a relationship shouldn't you remove the part where you say you make over a quarter million per year? Isn't that going to jump out at girls who will either a) be primarily interested in the money or b) not believe you and think you are full of [censored]? [/ QUOTE ] Interesting. Do other people agree with this? It seems like I need to use what I've got for max potential. Would a pic of my G35 accomplish this better or something? [/ QUOTE ] I think you could keep it and see what happens at first. If you start getting an inordinate amount of whores you can take it down |
|
#462
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If you are actually looking for a relationship shouldn't you remove the part where you say you make over a quarter million per year? Isn't that going to jump out at girls who will either a) be primarily interested in the money or b) not believe you and think you are full of [censored]? [/ QUOTE ] Interesting. Do other people agree with this? It seems like I need to use what I've got for max potential. Would a pic of my G35 accomplish this better or something? [/ QUOTE ] I think the correct play here is to make 2 myspace accounts. Have one all bling'd out and the other all low-key. That way you get the best of both worlds, wifeys on 1 account and whoooooooooooooooooers on the other. |
|
#463
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
If you start getting an inordinate amount of whores you can take it down [/ QUOTE ] I find this amusing given the nature of this thread. |
|
#464
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm not gonna lie, this thread has me rolling.
You guys are so analytical in your approach to meeting girls over the internet. Myspace/friendster prettymuch started as websites for scenesters and dorks to live on...now it is a legitimate dating service. I'm not putting you guys down, it's just a typical ***** player's mindset. Keep on keepin' on. PS JZ I added you. |
|
#465
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If you are actually looking for a relationship shouldn't you remove the part where you say you make over a quarter million per year? Isn't that going to jump out at girls who will either a) be primarily interested in the money or b) not believe you and think you are full of [censored]? [/ QUOTE ] Interesting. Do other people agree with this? It seems like I need to use what I've got for max potential. Would a pic of my G35 accomplish this better or something? [/ QUOTE ] i would say take the 250K bit out, its not really going to impress anyone in the right kind of way and most people will just think its a joke. and obviously the idea of putting up a picture of yourself with a wad of 100s or a luxury car is lame. |
|
#466
|
|||
|
|||
|
I say...
250k - out pics with nice cars - out (actually I think its okay, but not just posing in front of the car for a picture) some pics at a classy restaurant with friends - in other stuff like above |
|
#467
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I say... 250k - out pics with nice cars - out (actually I think its okay, but not just posing in front of the car for a picture) some pics at a classy restaurant with friends - in other stuff like above [/ QUOTE ] Sounds good. Do you think the pictures in Europe help accomplish this? Take a look at my other pics and see what you think. OOOT: are you dblgutshot on Stars? |
|
#468
|
|||
|
|||
|
my myspace adventure and stats:
i always hated myspace, but this thread and no sleep lead me to create an account around 6am this morning. my profile has a couple pictures, and is completely sparse, other than being changed to blue, and the about me saying "i am wary of the internets". that is all. the messages i randomly sent out equate to nothing more than a "hello, you are fairly attractive", but with a different vocabulary and words i am fond to use. profile views: 63 messages received : 89 (from ~45 different women) as i assumed earlier in this thread, the "inside?"-esque opener is wholly unnecessary and i would never use it. but whatever works is whatever works. |
|
#469
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sorry chuddo, I call BS on this post. It has already been proven in this thread that chicks never respond unless you message them something retarded and include a lame chocolate milkshake 'joke'. Yummy!!!!
|
|
#470
|
|||
|
|||
|
Where's the profile link?
|
![]() |
|
|