|
|
#171
01-16-2007, 04:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Election! - The Game Thread
[ QUOTE ]
Another thought: There are 17 village power roles, we have n0 peeks, and there are only 16 wolves + vanillagers. Anybody else feeling a mass claim? (Don't do it yet, but I think it's a near auto-win, especially if seers peeked vanillagers). [/ QUOTE ] Repeated because I think we win here. Plus, if they miss a seer their first night, the extra free peek is just devastating. 
|
|
#172
01-16-2007, 04:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Election! - The Game Thread
[ QUOTE ]
support chuck [/ QUOTE ] 
|
|
#174
01-16-2007, 04:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Election! - The Game Thread
[ QUOTE ]
if we just vote in "obvious villagers", its easy for the wolves to vote in the "obvious villagers" who aren't going to lynch them. i thought that was obvious... [/ QUOTE ] Ok I just don't see how that is any worse than supporting Traz because he is generically awesome. It gives us no information about anyone if Traz dies regardless of role because both villagers and wolves can vote for him with basically no reason. At least if an "obvious villager" dies and comes up wolf we can look back and see who supported him and why. Also, I don't ever recall playing in or reading a game where a newbie wolf was viewed as an "obvious villager" for more than a day or two. Particularly with the newbies, voting in obvious villagers seems like a very safe approach - its finding the obvious villagers that is the challenge.
|
|
#175
01-16-2007, 04:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Election! - The Game Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Another thought: There are 17 village power roles, we have n0 peeks, and there are only 16 wolves + vanillagers. Anybody else feeling a mass claim? (Don't do it yet, but I think it's a near auto-win, especially if seers peeked vanillagers). [/ QUOTE ] Repeated because I think we win here. Plus, if they miss a seer their first night, the extra free peek is just devastating. [/ QUOTE ] How would that work, since most of the roles are unprovable?
|
|
#176
01-16-2007, 04:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Election! - The Game Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Another thought: There are 17 village power roles, we have n0 peeks, and there are only 16 wolves + vanillagers. Anybody else feeling a mass claim? (Don't do it yet, but I think it's a near auto-win, especially if seers peeked vanillagers). [/ QUOTE ] Repeated because I think we win here. Plus, if they miss a seer their first night, the extra free peek is just devastating. [/ QUOTE ] 
|
|
#177
01-16-2007, 04:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Election! - The Game Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Another thought: There are 17 village power roles, we have n0 peeks, and there are only 16 wolves + vanillagers. Anybody else feeling a mass claim? (Don't do it yet, but I think it's a near auto-win, especially if seers peeked vanillagers). [/ QUOTE ] Repeated because I think we win here. Plus, if they miss a seer their first night, the extra free peek is just devastating. [/ QUOTE ] Bleh - even on the off chance it would work it totally runs counter to the spirit of the game. Even if it was an auto-win I wouldn't participate and I think there are a lot of others who wouldn't either.
|
|
#179
01-16-2007, 04:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Election! - The Game Thread
Also, voting in trustworthy villagers is akin to following seer-confirmed villagrs in a regular game. You don't do it just because they are "confirmed". The fact that they are confirmed doesn't mean they'll find wolves, under any circumstances.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
