what % of girls would u have sex with?

[NoMeansYes_]

100%

[punkass]

There will be that 5-10% of girls (too low?) that are just sickeningly disgusting that you wouldn't want to sit next to, let along poke at.

There will be another 15-30% of girls that don't do anything for you. Be it a certain hair color, height, race, whatever.

The rest is fair game while drunk/desperate.
While sober and trying not to embarrass myself in front of friends, I'm kinda picky, so that number would probably be half of the drunk number.

Drunk: 60-80%
Sober: 30-40%

[Hornacek]

Drunk 40%
Sober 50%

[marchron]

[ QUOTE ]
I was going to post something along the lines of "if you say <50% you're a liar," but after considering the number of fat/black/retarded chicks between 19-24, I'd say 25% is a realistic number.

[/ QUOTE ]
[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[Duke]

[ QUOTE ]
The real answer to this poll is "it depends."

I mean, OP should put us in a situation. "Would you have sex with" doesn't really explain the circumstances, even if you specify "when drunk."

For example, if I'm at a club and wasted, I'm not going to try to have sex with over 65% of the girls there. Take a girl who's in, say, the 30th percentile of hotness (chunky, bad skin, etc., but not totally horrid) -- I'd rather go home alone than put the moves on her and go back to her pad to have sex.

BUT, say I'm in some hypothetical bedroom, wasted out of my mind, and the same 30th percentile girl is lying on the bed begging for it, then yeah I would probably just go ahead and do it, since the alternative seems to be finding an unoccupied bed somewhere else in this hypothetical house in which to pass out.

Another problem with this poll -- a vast majority of the girls that people in this thread are saying they "would have sex with" would not have sex with them. That makes it all so abstract and academic that it loses all meaning.

[/ QUOTE ]

You're right about this. It's a crazy venn diagram and 3% might be a reasonable overlap for even average people.

[Oranzith]

seriously, the 19-24 age range is getting fat. girls are exercising less and eating more. no good.

not a fan of the fatties. 35%

[einbert]

A lot of self proclaimed racists in this thread. That makes me sad.

Four years ago I probably would have said 20% or something like that. Now I'm in the >65% camp. I'm 20 years old now.

[MusashiStyle]

ummm... i would probably do 60-80% of the chicks out there in my current state, but I am pretty pathetic.

[Golden_Rhino]

I would say 105%. (The extra 5% accounts for guts what look like chicks)

[Skoob]

Originally I answered over 65% to both questions but after a moment of though, I should have answered lower, probably more around 20-35%.

The age range implies college chicks (I'm 34 btw and would [censored] the [censored] out of any college chick in that age range), but the question just says, "females." So, I would have to weed out all the meth addicted, toothless skanks. Out would be all the chicks with AIDS or other STDs. There's lots in that age range, not in college, that are totally unnailable.

If the OP was rephrased to state college chicks, I think the percentage would be higher, but just any old skank out on the street? Not even half I don't think.