|
|
#51
12-19-2006, 07:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pro Bowl Players
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] As for % of total offense, it's a useless stat. [/ QUOTE ] Why? [/ QUOTE ] Because it favors featured players in bad offenses and has little correlation with a player's contribution to winning football games. [ QUOTE ] The only one you showed was that Westbrook is a more effective receiver, which I could say is useless because that is a result of offensive scheme. [/ QUOTE ] You could say a lot of retarded things if you wanted to. Each lost fumble costs greater than 4 points. 
|
|
#52
12-19-2006, 07:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pro Bowl Players
Complaints:
AFC WR- Starters: A. Johnson C. Johnson Reserves: Wayne/Harrison I think Wayne or Harrison should have started over AJ. Gonzo probably should have started over Gates (they have it the other way around) DT - starters Seymour J. Williams Reserve: Hampton I don't think Seymour should have made it. Hampton = starter, Henderson or Ngata = reserve. ILB: Starter - Al Wilson Reserve - Zach Thomas I'd have Thomas starting w/ Ryans as the backup. Also, for OT, its hard to argue that McNeil should be in above Ogden/Anderson/Glenn, but hopefully hes chosen to replace the injured Glenn. At Guard I think I start Waters over Shields this year. In the NFC, I'd have Larry Allen starting. Idk which starter sits for him though. I just think he should be the #1 guard. Also I'd like to congratulate the voters for getting the NFC SS starter right! Roy Williams is awesome it playing the run, but Adrian Wilson is just plain awesome!
|
|
#53
12-19-2006, 07:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pro Bowl Players
[ QUOTE ]
What is the definition of Power Runs? [/ QUOTE ] "Percentage of runs on third or fourth down, two yards or less to go, that achieved a first down or touchdown. Also includes runs on first-and-goal or second-and-goal from the two-yard line or closer." I wish I had the stats for just Westbrook and just Gore, but alas, I do not.
|
|
#54
12-19-2006, 07:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pro Bowl Players
A little surprised that Rivers got in over Brady, but I'll take it.
Also, does anyone else think John Lynch is overrated?
|
|
#55
12-19-2006, 07:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pro Bowl Players
Polamolu, Strong, Lynch, Al Wilson all shouldn't have made it. I'm sure there are others.
|
|
#56
12-19-2006, 07:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pro Bowl Players
[ QUOTE ]
Also, does anyone else think John Lynch is overrated? [/ QUOTE ] From the 3-4 Denver games I've watch this year, he appears to be playing great football still, especially against the run. I don't know if he deserved a spot though.
|
|
#57
12-19-2006, 07:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pro Bowl Players
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] As for % of total offense, it's a useless stat. [/ QUOTE ] Why? [/ QUOTE ] Because it favors featured players in bad offenses and has little correlation with a player's contribution to winning football games. [/ QUOTE ] Since when is the Pro Bowl about teams winning football games? If that's the case why are Driver, Boldin, Bulger, etc. on the team? [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] The only one you showed was that Westbrook is a more effective receiver, which I could say is useless because that is a result of offensive scheme. [/ QUOTE ] You could say a lot of retarded things if you wanted to. [/ QUOTE ] Are you saying that the offensive playcalling in Philly isn't a factor in Westbrook's receiving stats?
|
|
#58
12-19-2006, 07:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pro Bowl Players
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Also, does anyone else think John Lynch is overrated? [/ QUOTE ] From the 3-4 Denver games I've watch this year, he appears to be playing great football still, especially against the run. I don't know if he deserved a spot though. [/ QUOTE ] I'll rephrase the question. Does anyone else think someone OTHER than John Lynch should have gotten the Pro Bowl spot?
|
|
#59
12-19-2006, 07:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pro Bowl Players
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] As for % of total offense, it's a useless stat. [/ QUOTE ] Why? [/ QUOTE ] Because it favors featured players in bad offenses and has little correlation with a player's contribution to winning football games. [/ QUOTE ] Since when is the Pro Bowl about teams winning football games? If that's the case why are Driver, Boldin, Bulger, etc. on the team? [/ QUOTE ] Way to completely misunderstand.
|
|
#60
12-19-2006, 07:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pro Bowl Players
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Because it favors featured players in bad offenses and has little correlation with a player's contribution to winning football games. [/ QUOTE ] Since when is the Pro Bowl about teams winning football games? If that's the case why are Driver, Boldin, Bulger, etc. on the team? [/ QUOTE ] Uh, because they contributed to their team's victories? [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] The only one you showed was that Westbrook is a more effective receiver, which I could say is useless because that is a result of offensive scheme. [/ QUOTE ] You could say a lot of retarded things if you wanted to. [/ QUOTE ] Are you saying that the offensive playcalling in Philly isn't a factor in Westbrook's receiving stats? [/ QUOTE ] Read your own words.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
